DIRECTV – Petite Randy Moss – (2015) :30 (US)
Posted in: UncategorizedAccording to Wikipedia, Randy Moss is a retired 6′ 4″ American Football player. I’ve never heard of him before, firstly being a Brit and secondly avoiding sports as aversely as I might avoid a legionella outbreak. The format of this ad compares the real Moss to an inferior “Petite” version. It’s the very latest in a long line of mediocre ads that grabs at low hanging fruit. The reason this ad is morally as sour as licking a toxic puddle is that while previous ads have compared a celebrity to a silly version of themselves, this one goes for a short joke and spectacularly fails. It’s a coup de grace, an ad so dumb and damaging that is doesn’t even understand it’s own basic concept. Let me spell it out. You compare thing A to thing B. Thing B is an inferior version, but that inferiority comes from a personality or character fault. Bad comedian/ creepy/ arts and crafty. Here’s an illustration: “I’m David Felton. And I’m Shares Too Much Information David Felton.” It’s so obvious, an intern could write your ad in an hour. It’s advertising by numbers. It’s easy. How can you mess this up? How can you spectacularly screw up your own formula?
The problem is when you start ridiculing and basically putting the idea out there that short people are inferior. It’s saying to the American public: Tall = Success. Short = Pathetic. And here’s why. You’re taking the piss out of a physical quality someone has no control over. Would you make an ad: “Hi I’m Kevin Bacon… And I’m disabled Kevin Bacon.” No. Why? Because ridiculing disabled people isn’t okay is it DIRECTV, you morally bankrupt assholes. You understand that, don’t you? You’re not looking for laughs as the expense of those with cerebral palsy? That’s a start. How about race? “I’m the black guy!” No, you’re not playing race for laughs. Imagine the uproar if you did that. Similarly, you’re not taking the piss out of women, blind people, those with mental illness, etc. But who do you go after? The stutters? The autistics? Those with Prader-Willi Syndrome? No. You take a big monumental shit on all the short guys out there, because lol, short people are a joke, aren’t they? Short guys in particular. Short guys are the butt of your funny joke.
This is total garbage, actually damaging, cultural garbage. When we pause and look in detail at the advert in question, we see a host of caustic and frankly dumb social assumptions that the writers have sneaked in. For starters, real Moss is wealthy – in a beautifully decorated modern house. The place is, frankly, stunning, complete with art, sculpture and minimalist décor. Real moss wears a finely cut suit. He looks a million dollars. Several million at the least. Compare to Short Moss – he dresses like a kid in a unfashionable cardigan and collared shirt combo (because short people are JUST CHILDREN, GET IT??). He doesn’t get to live in the amazing house. He lives in the much shitter house (because short people EARN LESS MONEY, GET IT??). He doesn’t get to watch the Big Game. He watches cartoons (because short people are INTELLECTUALLY INFERIOR, GET IT???). The entire thing stinks from top to bottom. It’s an insulting embarrassment to anyone who touched it with a barge poll.
Here’s a response from a current DIRECTV customer, Geoffrey Arnold of New York, NY, speaking to Adland:
I think the most offensive part about this ad is that the creators of the ad thought they could get away with blatant body shaming because it was based on height instead of weight. Can you imagine the backlash such an ad would receive if it were “big boned” (insert famous athlete) who uses cable? Would they really use an overweight body as a punchline and risk alienating a large portion of their potential consumer base? I doubt it. However, body shaming is perfectly fine when it comes to height because they know that shorter men are unlikely to speak out for fear of being labeled with a complex or being seen as oversensitive.
Also note that the rest of the Direct TV ads that involve a “cable version” of a famous person all revolve around the odd or quirky behavior of that “cable version” versus the “DirectTV version”. But here, it wasn’t about “Petite Randy Moss’s” behavior, but about the body to which he was given. The message of the ad is clear. “Petite Randy Moss” isn’t a bad guy; it’s just that he’s very short and so he has a poor quality of life. That’s the joke. Get it? Apparently, DirectTV thinks that the mere existence of a short male body is a punchline. So…
I’ll be canceling my subscription at the end of the month.
That’s what happens when you make ads like these. You lose customers. And you deserve it, utterly.
Here’s a potential new customer, Nataka from California, who once again reached out to contact Adland:
This ad is a lazy attempt to market a product using poor humor.
I’ve seen Direct TV ads before where they have the creepy, jerk and meat-head guy (to name a few) playing the negative opposite role. The one common thing being the negative role is always a ‘choice’ lifestyle.
“Don’t be this guy” and pointing towards a character portraying a grown Man that is unable to reach the top shelf in a cereal isle is not funny. Direct TV is trying to advertise a NFL viewing package with this ad. Last I checked, the NFL was branding and marketing itself as a Family friendly sport. If I’m correct, what is a kid that’s already being bullied because of his height gonna think about the mixed message this ad is sending?
What indeed? Did you even stop to think for a few seconds before putting this piece of deleterious out into the world? Does Grey have the best account managers in New York? They should ask for a promotion if they’re pushing work this bad out. The AMs on this project must be learning hypnosis. That’s the only explanation. I am literally lost for words on how this got signed off. It’s intellectually and morally void; all you’re saying is ‘Short people are inferior, let’s laugh at them and how they can’t even reach a high shelf.’ Thought you could sneak a little ‘Giraffe Crunchies’ joke in too, eh?. Because giraffes are tall, unlike short people (who are pathetic), am I right?
In contrast, in an interview with Adland, Tom Megginson told us:
I’m a fairly short guy myself, but I don’t feel personally insulted. I think the sight gag is infantile, however in my opinion it would have been much worse if “Petite Randy Moss” had actually been a person with dwarfism (like Mini-Me in the Austin Powers films). So, offensive? Not quite worth any outrage. More like a slight. We small guys are used to it. I think they went out-of-their-way to stay on the safer side of making fun of physical size by making the smaller guy within “normal” height range.
Very interesting points from Tom. DIRECTV can’t ridicule actual Dwarfs, but apparently short men are fine – as long as they don’t have a medical condition. But how short do they have to be to become the butt of a joke? When does too short become just another disability?
People got themselves frothy at the mouth over a harmless “Are You Beach Body Ready” ad earlier in the year. It became a conversation about body shaming. This is the real body shaming, and it’s genuinely shameful.
Björn Borg "Training for Mars SS16" (2015) 1:00 (Sweden)
Posted in: UncategorizedCharles Schwab "The Boy Who Asked Questions" (2015) 1:30 (USA)
Posted in: UncategorizedWhen it comes to journalism, truth is dead, but narrative lives.
Posted in: UncategorizedTake this amazingly ill-researched and tone-deaf New York Times magazine article called The Creative Apocalypse That Wasnt in which one Steven Johnson insists that everything is just rosy when it comes to musicians earning a living. This is pure narrative, with zero truth to it, and it doesn’t take a genius to understand that. One need only to look at facts presented by musicians with better and more honest statistics to understand that, no, musicians aren’t raking it in. They’re not even middle class any more.
David Byrne pointed out that from 2012-2013 music sales fell by 6.3%. That number has hardly gone up in the past few years with Beats and Tidal, let alone Spotify and Pandora continuing to dominate the market.
And while the Times article points out that sales of ticket to live performances have gone up, as usual it assumes this rise more than makes up for the loss of music sales. Which is mathematically impossible unless you are charging $150 dollars a ticket like some of the legacy acts, like David Gilmour of Pink Floyd fame. A simple big picture view suggests correctly that the middle class is disappearing. Surely this would include the middle class musician as well.
Faulty math is one thing. But refusing to even consider the other side of the argument is outright tunnel vision. The Times article is myopic to the point of hilarity. Take for instance the fact that The Future Of Music Coalition served as a fact-checker on this article, and when they took issue with the article’s premise, were ignored. They wrote a response debunking most of the statistics. But wait– so did Salon and Flavorwire to name just a few.
When faced with skepticism at best from fact checkers, one would think the Times would want to have a second look. Instead they doubled down on the narrative, and got downright hostile when a musician questioned their statistics. But not just any musician. David Lowery, activist for the ethical treatment of musicians not only is in two bands, Cracker and Camper Van Beethoven, but he’s also a Lecturer at UGA with a mathematics background. In other words, he isn’t providing anecdotal evidence, but hard evidence.
So it’s amazing to me that Greg Brock, Senior Editor for Standards, would take such a flippant tone to Mr Lowery’s criticism of said Times article, when Lowery was refuting the faulty statistics. Brock’s pompous tone is indicative of just how far journalism has sunk. How our quest for the truth has been swapped for narrative at all costs. And a narrative that other major outlets are calling bullshit on, I might add.
I oversee the the corrections The Times, along with other issues on standards. I was aware of your initial query that was sent to the public editor’s office and then forwarded to us. Because of your continued complaints, I asked to see all of the correspondence and all of the research and documentation from the reporting. I agree with our researchers that no correction is warranted.
I’m sure this is a decision with which you will not agree. In fact, I could tell in reading your queries that you would never accept any explanation from us. Because of that, I see no reason to continue this. There will be no correction and this will be the only response from my office or from anyone else connected to the reporting and research.
It’s all the more ironic considering how journalism is suffering the same fate as any other content creator. Last year the Times planned on eliminating 100 of its staff. I wonder how Mr. Brock would have felt had someone written a piece insisting that The Times is thriving and journalists are making more money than ever.
Bar-B-Q Plaza – The Waiters Mom – (2015) 5:30 (Thailand)
Posted in: Uncategorized“When did you last have a meal with her?”
“What does she like?”
As the staff sink into emotional piles of guilt in their desks, body language like unhappy children, the piano and violin music swells. Oh damn you Thai emotional ads, you’re good. The whole idea is to give the staff a chance to bring their moms to the restaurant before mothers day as they will be working during mothers day – a very busy day in the restaurant business. Tugging at the emotional strings of the viewers again and again, as we now get to see the staff treat their moms to dinner and find out what they responded to the survey questions. Hugs and tears all around! This gets so sentimental it’s mawkish and painful. Please come back weirdo Thai ads like that ghost lightbulb one, all is forgiven!
53 Recreated Superhero Artworks – From Superhero Dog Art to Heroic Childhood Portraits (TOPLIST)
Posted in: UncategorizedUndressing Beverage Bottles – Yakult's Drinks Reveal Swimwear Styles Under a Packaging Layer
Posted in: Uncategorized56 Pooch-Honoring Portraits – These Canine Editorials are a Tribute to National Dog Day (TOPLIST)
Posted in: Uncategorized90 Back To School Accessories – Source Back to School Inspiration from These Stylish Items (TOPLIST)
Posted in: Uncategorized38 Nerdy Kitchen Accessories – From Galactic Kitchen Collections to Time Machine Spatulas (TOPLIST)
Posted in: Uncategorized36 Decadent Dessert Sandwiches – From Miniature Ice Cream Pies to Creamy Cereal Sandwiches (TOPLIST)
Posted in: UncategorizedBag that! / De quoi tomber dans les pommes?
Posted in: Uncategorized![]() |
![]() |
THE ORIGINAL? Vitasnella Fruit Crackers – 2010 Source : Adeevee Agency : Euro RSCG Milan (Italy) |
LESS ORIGINAL Egast 2016 “Salon Professionnel” – 2015 Source : Big Family Agency : Big Family, Strasbourg (France) |