After these messages?

During the holidays I had the pleasure of going to a movie with the family. The two hour break was a much-welcomed respite in the days-long marathon of constant family interaction and I was looking forward to not only the feature itself, but the trailers as well. A good twenty minutes before the trailers began though, I was treated to First Look NCM’s “ground-breaking pre-feature show.” The intro promised behind the scenes footage and celebrity interviews. “Cool” I thought, at least until it started running. Out of the 20 minutes of content, maybe 3 were devoted to movie related content. The rest was entirely advertising. And we’re not talking great-looking, big production ads that might feel at home in a theater venue. First Look’s “revolutionary pre-feature entertainment” consisted of ads for such stellar programming as the new season of American Gladiator, Celebrity Apprentice, an ad for a local car dealer and my personal favorite the awesome rock anthem Citizen Soldier performed by 3 Doors Down promoting the National Guard. I’m not against pre-feature entertainment or even cinema ads, but let’s try to keep the content relevant. Let’s see some cool behind the scenes footage as promised. Or show me spots that relate more closely to the feature (Let’s see, The Golden Compass so maybe a gaming ad? Yes, my cape is showing). Just don’t make me pay $12 to see a movie and then force me to sit through stuff that I would Tivo through at home. That is not integrating marketers with attention-grabbing content that is going to connect their brands with movie-goers. And really, who wants to see Donald Trump’s puckered face that big anyway?

Technorati Tags: , ,

I mean, really?

Okie dokie, so big George Parker’s blog AdHurl talked about this already, but I had to chime in. Apparently Pantone, Inc has chosen its color of the year. Yes, the color of the year. My God Alive!

Read below, but know you don’t have to as this is the most ridiculous shit I have ever seen.

“From a color forecasting perspective, we have chosen PANTONE 18-3943 Blue Iris as the color of the year, as it best represents color direction in 2008 for fashion, cosmetics and home products,” explains Leatrice Eiseman, executive director of the Pantone Color Institute®. “As a reflection of the times, Blue Iris brings together the dependable aspect of blue, underscored by a strong, soul-searching purple cast. Emotionally, it is anchoring and meditative with a touch of magic. Look for it artfully combined with deeper plums, red-browns, yellow-greens, grapes and grays.”

Even for those whom Pantone colors give a major nerd-gasm to, I can’t imagine who really followed this heated battle. Did the other colors go out drinking that night to drown their sorrows? Who was the board of experts to choose this groundbreaking color?

Ultimately I ask, is there any point to this? Or is this just a crap PR ploy to add relevance to over inflated Crayola designers? Should it have its own day? I think March 8th is open.

Can’t we just be comfortable saying “we study colors for a living” instead of having some trite award given out to justify our existence?

AAAAGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

Take care rockers.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Ribbit has the tech part down, but what about consumer marketing?

News media outlets are heralding Ribbit’s goal to “be the platform company for Voice 2.0 applications.” Countless articles in mainstream news media and posts in blog media have appeared, written by individuals with a solid command of exactly what Ribbit is all about. Om Malik, writing for GIGAOM, sums it up: “…what they have done is built their own Class 5 softswitch and back-end infrastructure and married it to front-end technologies like Flash and Flex from Adobe Systems (ADBE).” Okay, if you say so.

The company calls itself, “Silicon Valley’s first phone company.” Chief Executive Officer Ted Griggs comes across as a really nice guy on a promotional video. The video will probably challenge the attention deficit Web readers are known for. Griggs basically talks about the company and what the technology means.  But the video is about as lively as a lint brush. There’s a photo of a guy in a suit on the front page of the Ribbit Web site. He’s in a Zen state of mind. Who is he supposed to be speaking to? Even a developer wouldn’t relate to this guy. Your average person, to get excited about this product, needs to know in flat English what Ribbit is going to do for us and what it will cost.

 

A page on the company’s Web site does give consumers an idea of what to expect. You’ll be able to: make calls through your computer so you have a phone wherever you have an internet connection, read your voicemails so audio playback is no longer a necessity, play your messages in any order so you decide the order of importance, and access your messages on the go from any phone through a smart voicemail interface.

A New York Times headline asked, “Would you buy a telephone from a company named Ribbit?” Most of us would if we get a unique service at reasonable cost. I actually think the name can be an asset—frogs are cute and there’s a lot of creative leeway in those little amphibians. Think about what GEICO does with a gecko who talks like an Aussie and has better manners than most of us. You have to wonder what kind of accent a Ribbit-promoting frog might speak with, in between ribbits.

Meanwhile, developers are positive. According to the Ribbit Web site, more than 600 have joined the development community to date,  located throughout the world in over 65 countries, including the U.S., Europe, Brazil, China, and India. Time will tell whether future marketing efforts will succeed with consumers—maybe we’ll see a Valley girl frog offering up a designer beer, ‘ribbiting’ with zest, selling us on a new phone service in the process.

 

Honeyshed not so sweet.

After much hype, and a much-delayed launch, Publicis’ leap into branded entertainment — Honeyshed where “MTV meets QVC.” — has finally launched. “Honeyshed is a broadband destination that celebrates the sell,” according to Andrew Essex, CEO of Droga5. All well and good, but do consumers really want to celebrate the sell? And perhaps more importantly, does the jaded and elusive 18-24 demographic want to?

Honeyshed

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m a big fan of new types of content and advertising, but after all they hype I find myself a little under whelmed. I can’t help but feeling like I’m watching SNL’s retarded younger cousin, and he is trying to sell me stuff. While the hosts are attractive enough, their comedic stylings leave a lot to be desired. And the pods run long, way too long for what they are. When I compare what they are doing here to the content on Current that also targets the same demo, it just doesn’t make the grade. To be fair, the content on Current is editorial, but it’s just so much more engaging. Honeyshed on the other hand feels exactly like what it is: a blatant attempt by advertisers to create something hip and cool. And as we all know, you can’t be cool and smack of effort at the same time. Perhaps most telling is the live chat window. No one is talking about the products or the brands, but rather how much the content sucks. Hardly a celebration of the sell.

Honeyshed chat window

Technorati Tags: , ,

Support the Writers!

If you have a creative bone in you at all, you should most definitely support the writers during the strike. If you would like to stay current with the ordeal, you can visit Hollywood Interrupted.