10 Reasons to Try a Website Analysis Report Since Your Website Is Not Performing

A lot of websites are created and then left to operate without review. While many websites perform just fine, it is the websites that are constantly audited that eventually return a higher ROI to the owner. A thorough website analysis report can tell you a lot about your website, including errors that are costing you conversions. Even if you don’t feel your website needs a review, consider why some of the biggest websites on the Internet do quarterly reviews.

They’re Inexpensive
Some analysis reports can be costly, but there are some out there that aren’t. In fact, some companies will offer free analysis reports as part of their membership. If cost is an issue, consider the amount of money you might be wasting not analyzing your site. Errors, poor performance or improper search engine optimization can cost your business hundreds (if not thousands) annually.

They’re Thorough
A website review is thorough and looks at multiple areas. A typical website analysis report will cover areas like search engine optimization, readability, performance, content, navigation and organization, etc. The points a review goes over are things that can take the average website owner days to complete.

They Review Your SEO
Search engine optimization is critical for your website. By using the right keywords and phrases on your site you tell search engines how to index your site. Then, when a user searches based on the keywords you’ve integrated into your website, he or she is directed to your business via the search engine results page.

A thorough analysis can review your website’s use of SEO. It can make sure you’re using the proper techniques based on the latest search engine releases (such as Google’s Panda, Penguin or Hummingbird updates) and can also make sure you’re not committing any black hat SEO tactics. With the right analysis you can see what keywords are working best for your website and what keywords aren’t driving much traffic.

They Find Critical, Technical Errors
Technical errors can hurt your website’s conversion rate. Issues like page errors, dead links, or images that don’t load might turn potential buyers away. A website analysis report looks for these technical errors on your website. They can find errors in your shopping carts, checkout pages and even your blog that are hindering your website and business performance.

They Analyze Your Website Performance
Technical errors can ruin a website, but so can performance issues. Slow-moving pages or poor-quality graphics deter customers from making purchases. Because Internet users are shopping online for convenience and speed, they often will leave a website if it doesn’t perform to their standards. It’s crucial you identify performance issues and fix them right away not only for your conversion rate, but for your brand’s reputation as well.

They’re Unbiased
As a website owner you’ve built your business and site; therefore, you have a biased attachment to your products. A website analysis report is unbiased and takes an objective look at your site. This is important for identifying issues. After all, what you might think is fine a review can prove is turning customers away.

An in-depth website analysis report is something every website owner should conduct. Whether you have an ecommerce site, blog or you just operating landing pages, knowing how your domain is performing helps save you time and money in the long run. As you improve your website you should also conduct a review to make sure your changes still benefit your site. Over time you can improve your site’s functionality and usability — which might give your conversion rate a hearty increase as well.

This is a guest post.

The post 10 Reasons to Try a Website Analysis Report Since Your Website Is Not Performing appeared first on AdPulp.

Web Services Covers

Un excellent travail de l’artiste Stéphane Massa-Bidal, déjà présenté en mai 2009 pour Retrofuturs Quotes. Des couvertures au style rétro afin de présenter les services sociaux et web 2.0 du moment. Plus d’image de son travail dans la suite de l’article.



retro5

retro4

retro3

retro2

retro1

La suite est disponible dans la galerie

Previously on Fubiz

More Than A Toy

Fred Wilson wants to get serious and break out of the 2.0 box.

I am a bit jealous of friends who are working on finding and funding alternative energy or biomedical technologies that have the potential to address the serious problems facing the world. At times it seems that helping the web become more social, intelligent, mobile, and playful is not as impactful.

The work that we do at Union Square Ventures can’t just be about making money. At least that’s not enough for me. It has to be a force for positive social change. It needs to be about making the world a better place for our children and their children.

I feel the same way. In fact, I’ve always harbored the idea that someday the work I do in this business might be needed by companies or movements that truly are important. That all I’m doing now is preparation for that, as yet unspoken, need.

Time Warner Wants You To Pay For Your Web Usage

My first reaction to this story is that if anything could kill off interactive marketing, it’d be this:

Some customers of Time Warner Cable in Beaumont, Texas, may soon end up paying more for their Internet access than other customers.

In a test of metered Internet access that’s set to begin Thursday, subscribers who go over their limit for uploading and downloading material will be charged $1 per gigabyte, according to an Associated Press story, citing a Time Warner Cable executive.

The trial run for the metered Web use was expected. The company had said in January that it would test the new pricing model in Beaumont as a way to limit the use of peer-to-peer applications on its network. Cable companies and P2P services have long clashed over bandwidth demands, especially for the transfer of large video files.

The tiered pricing will work this way, for the Internet portion of subscription packages that also include phone or video use: At the low end, users will pay $29.95 per month for service at a speed of 768 kilobits per second, with a 5GB monthly cap. At the high end, users will pay $54.90 per month for service at 15 megabits per second, with a 40GB cap.

Web 2.0 applications and rich media websites are big suckers of space, speed, and downloading time. I get frustrated with any slow-loading site, and if it takes too long or needs to refresh, I’m outta there.

If the big ISPs go to metered or tiered pricing, the ad industry will need to react fast. Who would want to download extraneous marketing stuff if the meter’s running? Is this as big as a potential trouble spot as I think it might be?

Are Digital Accounts Headed For More Consolidation?

This Ad Age article about Subaru caught my eye:

Subaru of America is moving its digital account from one of the industry’s hottest specialists, R/GA, to its Interpublic Group of Cos. sibling, Carmichael Lynch, Minneapolis.

The business moved without a review and was part of a consolidation. Subaru had no issues with R/GA, a spokesman for the automaker said, noting that it makes sense to have the entire account in one place. Subaru handed Carmichael Lynch its estimated $150 million national media and creative account without a review last fall.

The spokesman said Carmichael Lynch wasn’t equipped to handle the digital account a year ago, but it is now.

Are we going to see more of this? Will digital specialists like R/GA have trouble holding onto accounts if more general market agencies get their act together? Does it make sense to keep the entire account at one agency for integration purposes? Or can digital agencies start beefing up strategic thinking and take the lead on brands?

Look into your crystal ball and tell me what you see.

Here’s A Shocker: Folks Are Wary Of Targeted Online Ads

From Wired News:

Targeted ads might be a brass ring for the online marketers, but consumers just aren’t buying it. According to a recent Harris Interactive survey, 59 percent of Americans take exception to Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo tracking their online activities for marketing purposes.

The nationwide survey was conducted with the help of Dr. Alan F. Westin, Professor of Public Law and Government Emeritus at Columbia. Westin argues that the distrust stems from consumers disbelief of the value proposition offered by marketers.

Once people find out how they’re being tracked, they don’t like it. But usually, they’re not aware of how they’re being tracked. And there just isn’t much of an upside for consumers to all this tracking; the benefit is to marketers.

When Everyone Is “The Media” You’re Perpetually Exposed

Laughing Squid is liking this video from Gary Vaynerchuk.

How about you? Do you buy that communications technology can and will work wonders for the forces for good, while exposing the evil-minded for the cretin that they are? I like the concept. But it seems like a bit of a reach.

Social Media: The Disruptive Child

BusinessWeek took an interest in Clay Shirky’s new book about what happens when people are given the tools to do things together, without needing traditional organizational structures.

In his book, Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, author and NYU faculty member Clay Shirky describes the profound impact of social technological tools on contemporary culture—from e-mail and blogs to Twitter and wikis.

In Shirky’s view, we’re living in the middle of a revolution as momentous as that which followed the invention of the printing press. Society and industry, in other words, are being radically reshaped.

Shirky calls for readers to acknowledge the new reality and look to the future. “The important questions aren’t about whether these tools will spread or reshape society but rather how they do so.”

How society will be reshaped is cause for debate and genuine concern. For instance, if our newspapers are killed off by the rise of consumer-generated news, we will be that much more uninformed. Not pretty.

[NOTE] This is AdPulp’s 5000th post.

The Open Brand: A Perfect Guidebook to Web 2.0

I’ve long said that major corporations and marketers simply don’t want to “join the conversation,” so to speak. They’d prefer not to engage in two-way dialogue with their customers and would just as soon keep the one-way megaphone.

But now comes a very persuasive little handboook for those very marketers, The Open Brand: When Push Comes to Pull in a Web-Made Worldby Kelly Mooney and Nina Rollins.

41Nlbv5bu8L._AA240_.jpg

Despite its small size (think of it as a Lonely Planet Guide to Web 2.0), it’s a very thorough compendium of all the definitions, types, and issues surrounding new media, a new type of “engaged citizen” and what it means to “open up” a brand to all the new forms of marketing. As it is, it’s a very of-the-moment book, that is to say it may be all different a year from now.

The Open Brand is chock-full of case studies, diagrams, and techniques for moving brands along. And it also broaches a number of legal issues surrounding blogs and the “fair use” of materials in consumer-generated ideas.

If you, your agency, or in particular a client of yours needs an introduction, replete with glossary, to get them up to speed on new media and Web 2.0-type ideas, The Open Brand is a great place to start.

Special thanks to FSB Associates for providing me a copy for review.

Ad Age Does Digital

This week’s Advertising Age is nearly entirely devoted to issues surrounding digital marketing and web advertising. I highly recommend it. There’s a lot of good stuff to read, and the Ad Age staff did a great job covering as much of it as they could. It’s both a high-level look at the state of digital as well as a dive into specific topics.

Here’s a bit of one article, written by Matthew Creamer:

What you’re about to read is not an argument for making over web marketing as a factory for destination websites or for making every brand a content player. This, however, is a call to give some thought to a question that’s not asked enough about the Internet: Should it even be viewed as an ad medium? After all, in some quarters of the broader marketing world, the habit of looking at advertising as the most important tool in the marketers’ toolbox is undergoing intense interrogation. Consider the growth of the word-of-mouth marketing business, premised on the notion that people not corporations who help other people make consumer decisions. Or look at the growing importance put on public relations and customer-relationship management both in marketing circles and even in the c-suite.

The same conversation should be going on around the Internet. Trends like those listed suggest the possibility of a post-advertising age, a not-too-distant future where consumers will no longer be treated as subjects to be brainwashed with endless repetitions of whatever messaging some focus group liked. That world isn’t about hidden persuasion, but about transparency and dialogue and at its center is that supreme force of consumer empowerment, the Internet. But when you look at how the media and marketing business packages the Internet — as just more space to be bought and sold — you have to worry that the history of mass media is just trying to repeat itself. Rarely a fortnight goes by without some new bullish forecast for ad growth that works to stoke digital exuberance within media owners that often drowns out critical thinking about the medium itself.

Yeah, that critical thinking stuff sometimes gets lost when there are mountains of money changing hands.

Here Comes Hulu

Tomorrow marks the official launch of Hulu, which is the latest move to provide full-length TV shows and movies via the Web. And it has some big names behind it:

Hulu, the online video joint venture of News Corp and General Electric’s NBC Universal, will make its public debut on Wednesday with programming from Time Warner Inc’s Warner Bros Television Group, Lionsgate and from sports leagues.

Missing from the list of providers are media mogul Sumner Redstone-controlled companies Viacom Inc, which continues to hold discussions, Viacom said recently, and CBS Corp, which has said it was not averse to a licensing deal.

At launch, Hulu will offer full-length episodes of more than 250 TV series from current hits such as “The Simpsons” as well as older shows like “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” It also will offer 100 movies including “The Big Lebowski” and “Mulholland Drive.”

Hulu said it has signed licensing deals with the National Basketball Association and the National Hockey League.

Hulu’s launch is a big bet by big media companies that consumers are as eager to spend long periods of time watching TV shows and movies in front of their computers as they are in front of their televisions.

That last sentence is an interesting one. I tend to drift (or click away) from long-form content when I’m on the net. What about you?

It’s Social, It Won’t Bite

John Bell, who head up Ogilvy PR’s global 360° Digital Influence team, touches on the difficulty of selling social media plans to mainstream clients.

Many brands and businesses want to take advantage of social media – influencer outreach, activation of networks or communities and radical visibility – to fill out their marcom plan. They are not ready, or maybe even suitable for organizational change. They need to launch a product, boost sales this quarter, or demonstrate that they are innovative. We see this with many consumer package goods companies (CPGs). They are sales machines. Often their brand leadership is transitory at best. The brand managers move from brand to brand within the organization as they conquer challenges.

Bell advocates experimentation, but notes that a less-committed approach, can lead to shortcuts and shortcuts can lead to program “underperformance” and a perceived sense of failure.