Talking broiler chicken, germ maps and maggots with Andreas Greiner

csm_dbroileb59c00
Andreas Greiner, Monument for the 308 (detail), 2016. Exhibition view of Andreas Greiner. Agentur des Exponenten. GASAG Kunstpreis 2016, Berlinische Galerie, 2016. Photo: Harry Schnitger

Andreas Greiner has built a monument to the humble broiler. A 7 meter high 3D printed version of a real chicken that had lived and died in a battery farm in Brandenburg, Germany. The artist then installed the giant sculpture inside the main hall of the Berlinische Galerie. I haven’t seen it yet but it looks poignant. It has the imposing presence of a dinosaur skeleton, the photogenic appeal of an instagram star but the mistrustful contours of a chicken that has never seen trees, grass or the light of a sunny day.

Not that i’ve ever seen any broiler chicken alive. I’m just assuming, extrapolating and letting my mind wander. Because Greiner’s work excels at triggering your imagination: he quietly lays in front of your eyes some visually stunning concepts and ideas, he never suffocates them with explanations but lets you ponder upon them and draw your own conclusions about what they say about our society, economy and culture.

monument_andreas_greiner_1-800x1200
Andreas Greiner, Monument for the 308, 2016. Exhibition view of Andreas Greiner GASAG Kunstpreis 2016, Berlinische Galerie, 2016, Photo. Theo Bitzer

Monument for 308 shows that Greiner is comfortable working on the macro scale but he is also quietly building an impressive career engaging with the small (maggots, flies, algae, tiny crustaceans), and the very very small (microbes of all sorts.) Greiner works with living organisms (including himself when he decided to spend a week inside a gallery in the sole company of a few insects and plants), enrolling them as both subjects of careful reflection and as collaborators. His previous projects involved buying 40 litres of maggots and bringing them to the exhibition space until they turn into flies, composing music based on? the luminous skin of a squid, convincing the Director of the Neue Nationalgalerie in Berlin to consider a fly as a living artwork and provide for its well-being, photographing portraits of algae, carefully orchestrating explosions around Berlin, etc.

The young artist recently received the GASAG Art Prize, a recognition awarded to Berlin-based artists whose work dialogues with technology and science. I caught up with him to discuss chicken, bacterial maps and the perils of working with maggots:

heinrich_totus_corpus_0-800x1200
Heinrich, Totus Corpus – full Body Portrait of a broiler, 2015, Photo: Theo Bitzer & Andreas Greiner

Hi Andreas! I find your chicken projects very moving. But then i’ve always had a soft spot for animals. Which kind of response and reflection do you hope to elicit with works like Monument for the 308 and Heinrich (poor poor little battery chickens)?

I’m not necessarily looking to provoke pity for Heinrich, the broiler chicken. How a person reacts to my works is of course not in my control, however I would like the viewer to reflect upon the issue. We create these animals for the sole purpose of our eating habits, this is a species, which would not exist like this were it not for humans intervention into their breeding behaviour and anatomy. Heinrich is a metaphor, he represents our contemporary age in which humans are the driving creative and destructive force on planet earth. If dinosaurs are a relic from the Mesozoic Era, broiler chicken would be a “monument” of now.

0_eleonore_in_der_0185
Andreas Greiner, fattened chicken Éléonore before CT scan in Berlin, 2015

heinrich_craniocervical_andreas_greiner_2-1200x800
Heinrich at the petting zoo in Berlin Tempelhof, 2015

1ulrike7-2dc9a
Andreas Greiner, Ulrike (Euastrum oblongum) Electron scanning micrograph 2016 measurement: Andreas Greiner and Martina Heider, Bayerisches Polymerinstitut, University Bayreuth

After Heinrich died, his body underwent an autopsy. What did you learn from it?

Heinrich died a few months after I handed him over to a petting zoo. The autopsy found that he most likely died from a heart attack, probably because his body was just too heavy.

I found the description of the works on your website to be fairly neutral and factual but i couldn’t help wonder whether these works were trying to make a point about animal welfare, man-made forms of nature, the food industry or maybe even veganism?

They are pointing to all of those and more. Certainly they also reflect my personal view. There is a general disregard for certain animals, which we view as an objective mass – matter to be exploited to fit our needs. My works show this, but I chose to only have short, factual descriptions like for example the documentations on my website. The reception should stay open for individual interpretation. By dealing with issues such as factory farming, genetic manipulation or the identity of animals, of course, the viewer makes their own conclusions in the end.

every_fly_7-1200x800
Andreas Greiner, Every Fly is a Piece of Art, University of the Arts, Berlin, 2012

every_fly_0-1200x800
Andreas Greiner, Every Fly is a Piece of Art, University of the Arts, Berlin, 2012

every_fly_2-1200x800
Andreas Greiner, Every Fly is a Piece of Art, University of the Arts, Berlin, 2012

every_fly_5-1200x800
Andreas Greiner, Every Fly is a Piece of Art, University of the Arts, Berlin, 2012

every_fly_3-1200x800
Andreas Greiner, Every Fly is a Piece of Art, University of the Arts, Berlin, 2012

I was feeling less sorry for the maggots then flies in the work Every Fly is a Piece of Art. I’m wondering how the whole adventure unfolded though. Did you really manage to buy all available fly maggots in Berlin and did you manage to control the flies and channel them through the exit as you had hoped? It sounds to me like a wild project where so many elements can take a direction that wasn’t expected…

Yes, it was slightly chaotic. I conceived this work for the final exhibition of my masters at the University of the Arts in Berlin. Back in 2012 with a students budget it was impossible to buy all the flies in Berlin. I visited every fisherman shop that sells maggots though and bought a huge amount of their maggots in stock. Most of the salesmen were afraid to loose their clients if they sold all of their maggots to me in order to really buy all oft them I would have had to bribe the salesmen.

In the exhibition they started hatching and flying about. All the painting students of the other studios were mad at me because the flies landed on their freshly painted surfaces. They reacted by constructing fly traps, which turned my intentions around completely. I actually had to end the project earlier than the official end of the master class exhibition – at least half of the flies (about 100 000) hatched outside in nature. After this experience, I decided to only work with a few flies or one fly at a time because this is more foreseeable.

Your practice seems to be an interesting mix of collaboration with scientists and other experts along with processes that make control over the final artworks a bit difficult.  How important is it for you to be in control (or rather maybe not be in control) of the art piece you are developing?

I am interested in the processual aspects of sculpture and have integrated living organisms into many of my works. I call this co-authorship, as they co-create and transform the art work by the process of living. Uncontrollable biological processes are an integral part of the outcome of an art work.

By working with experts and scientists I am able to broaden and deepen my work by researching very specific topics and techniques. I am interested in an exchange between artistic and scientific knowledge.

spring_forward_0-1200x800
Andreas Greiner, Spring Forward Fall Back, Lichthaus, Kunstverein Arnsberg, 2014. Photo: Vlado Velkov

spring_forward_2
Andreas Greiner, Spring Forward Fall Back, Lichthaus, Kunstverein Arnsberg, 2014. Photo: Vlado Velkov

spring_forward_5-1200x800
Andreas Greiner, Spring Forward Fall Back, Lichthaus, Kunstverein Arnsberg, 2014. Photo: Vlado Velkov

spring_forward_1-1200x800
Andreas Greiner, Spring Forward Fall Back, Lichthaus, Kunstverein Arnsberg, 2014. Photo: Vlado Velkov

I’m very curious about Spring Forward Fall Back and what you experienced during this cohabitation with an ecosystem you had created for you and for nature. What did you learn and observe during that week? How did the insects, plants and other living entities inhabit and modify the space over time?

I was invited by the Kunstverein Arnsberg for a show at the Lichthaus and decided to live in there for a week. It was an interesting experience. First of all I learnt, that spring in Arnsberg (in the Sauerland, Western Germany) starts later then in the rest of Germany. In the beginning there were few insects, for example a single bumblebee got lost, it moved very slowly because of the cold. I brought a female moth with me from Berlin and later she actually attracted a local male moth. Insect match-making. By the end of the exhibit an ant colony had settled and the population of my animal co-inhabitants and plants had multiplied 5 times.

dominions_andreas_greiner_6-1200x800
Andreas Greiner &, Julian Charrière, Dominions, 2011, collecting microbes at Schwarze Pumpe, Brandenburg

dominions_andreas_greiner_11-1200x800
Andreas Greiner &, Julian Charrière, Dominions, 2011, example of an expressed growth pattern by microbes

dominions_andreas_greiner_7-1200x800
Andreas Greiner &, Julian Charrière, Dominions, 2011, collecting microbes at Elsdorf, Brandenburg, Nordrhein-Westfalen

dominions_andreas_greiner_2-1200x800
Andreas Greiner &, Julian Charrière, Dominions, 2011, exhibition view

In Dominions you created bacterial maps of Germany and Switzerland. From the photos and videos on the project page, it seems that you collected the microbes from very specific and interesting looking locations. Could you tell us about these places and what guided your selection of them as well as of the selection of the microbes?
And what links the humble microbes with the title of the work, Dominions?

The project was a collaboration with Julian Charrière when we were still students at Olafur Eliasson‘s Institute for Spatial Experiments. We selected places in Germany and Switzerland. Some were biographically relevant (our birthplaces in Germany and Switzerland) and others were geographically important places, such as the highest mountain in Germany, the three border triangle between Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands, the eastern most point of Germany, etc. We brought sterile boxes filled with a plane layer of white culture medium for microgerms (comparable to an unexposed film or white canvas) and exposed them to the surroundings for 30min each. The collected bacteria and spores expressed different patterns and colours back in Berlin under vitrine glass.

By selecting germs from all these chosen places we reconstructed a map of Germany and Switzerland, which is not based on socio-political conventions, but defined by the microorganisms populating these areas. It’s a reference to landscape painting or photography – a snapshot of the non-perceiveable micro-landscape in the air. We humans assume to have over our landscapes with roads, cities and railways criss-crossing though the country. But it’s microorganisms, like algae and bacteria, which cover the earth and have dominion over it.

Speaking of humble lives, what is it that attracts you to the underdogs like microbes, algae, maggots, broiler chickens, etc?

One of the challenges of art is to visualize things: show things from a different perspective, or things that are generally not seen. There is a staggering mass of life that we humans never visually appreciate: industrial broiler chicken, deep-sea squids, algae which are too small to be visible, or insects, because we find them repulsive. I consider the way we interact with our surroundings very telling of our species and our times.

From Strings to Dinosaurs shown at the exhibition cycle “MULTITUDES”, curated by Anna Henckel and Nadim Samman, at Import Projects and Cycle Music and Art Festival, 2015

cspianocbd65c7
EExhibition view of “Andreas Greiner. Agentur des Exponenten. GASAG Kunstpreis 2016”, Berlinische Galerie, 2016. Photo: Harry Schnitger

Any upcoming project, field of research or event you could share with us?

This month, I have two exhibitions in Berlin: Golden Gate together with Armin Keplinger at Kwadrat and DAS NUMEN MEATUS at Dittrich and Schlechtriem. The finissage of my exhibition in the Berlinische Gallerie is on the 6th of February, where Tyler Friedman and I will show the work From Strings to Dinosaurs. The algae in the reactor will be placed on top of the self-playing piano and illuminate during the musical composition.

Künstler Andreas Greiner in seinem Atelier in der Malzfabrik, Berlin Tempelhof Foto: Mike Wolff
Artist Andreas Greiner in his Berlin workshop. Photo: Mike Wolff in Der Tagesspiegel

Thanks Andreas!

Source

Though Not Scientific, Trump's Media Survey Reinforces Resentment of Press


One day after an epic press conference during which President Donald Trump repeatedly criticized and diminished long-respected media outlets such as CNN as purveyors of “fake news,” his still-operating campaign arm and the Republican National Committee have reinforced their media-as-opposition message by disseminating a “Mainstream Media Accountability Survey” to supporters.

Some professional market researchers and GOP pollsters suggest that despite its appearance, the survey is nothing more than a means of egging on supporters to cough up more data, and questioned its validity.

“You would never use data from a biased sample of email list subscribers as a replacement for traditional public opinion research, and that’s not likely what they’re using it for,” said Patrick Ruffini, co-founder of Republican research firm Echelon Insights and former RNC digital strategy director. “Given the fact that Trump can’t stop talking about the ‘lying media,’ I suspect this is one of the better tools in their arsenal to land people on a donation page after taking the survey.”

Continue reading at AdAge.com

Mamilos 98 – Economia 2017 e Censura

E essa semana temos a volta da Diva Laura pra descascar um abacaxi gigante: como estamos e quais são as previsões econômicas para 2017. Para ajudar nessa tarefa inglória, além da fiel escudeira Cris Bartis contamos ainda com o economista do Instituto Mercado Popular Pedro Menezes e com a participação especial de Marcelo Coutinho, diretor […]

> LEIA MAIS: Mamilos 98 – Economia 2017 e Censura

Book review – Public Servants. Art and the Crisis of the Common Good

Public Servants. Art and the Crisis of the Common Good, edited by Johanna Burton, Shannon Jackson and Dominic Willsdon. Foreword by Lisa Phillips.

On amazon USA and UK.

9780262034814

Publisher MIT Press writes: How should we understand the purpose of publicly engaged art in the twenty-first century, when the very term “public art” is largely insufficient to describe such practices?

Concepts such as “new genre public art,” “social practice,” or “socially engaged art” may imply a synergy between the role of art and the role of government in providing social services. Yet the arts and social services differ crucially in terms of their methods and metrics. Socially engaged artists need not be aligned (and may often be opposed) to the public sector and to institutionalized systems. In many countries, structures of democratic governance and public responsibility are shifting, eroding, and being remade in profound ways—driven by radical economic, political, and global forces. According to what terms and through what means can art engage with these changes?

0mel-chins-safe-house
Mel Chin, Safehouse, 2008-2010. Part of Operation Paydirt and Operation Paydirt Headquarters in New Orleans. Photo via Jan Rotschild

a125-1024x680-1-1024x680-1024x680
Simone Leigh in collaboration with Stuyvesant Mansion, Free People’s Medical Clinic offered a “limited array of homeopathic and allopathic services ranging from yoga instruction to community acupuncture, all offered by Brooklyn-based practitioners”. Photo via A Blade of Grass

I’ve long stopped counting the number of books dedicated to art&activism that i’ve read and reviewed over the past couple of years. Socially-engaged art practice is a tremendous art crowd-pleaser. It is catchy, slightly subversive and easy to label and package to avid audiences. <a href="http://www.artnews.com/2016/11/30/basel-goers-greeted-by-giant-sam-durant-proclaiming-Besides, the rapid erosion of the structures of democratic governance and public responsibility makes a direct engagement of art with the public sphere seem unavoidable.

Public Servants. Art and the Crisis of the Common Good collects existing and newly commissioned essays in which artists, critics, curators and historians interrogate the definition, purposes and reception of socially engaged art. The authors reflect on questions such as: Can art projects efficiently respond to concrete community needs? How much of an impact can they have? And how do you measure this impact? According to which criteria? Does it make sense for a socially engaged work to last only a couple of months, until a biennial or festival closes? How do you sustain a longer term engagement with a particular issue? How embedded do artists have to be in communities in order to see change happen? Is a new aesthetic vocabulary arising from these practices? etc.

I wasn’t expecting an explosion of optimism and brashness. I’ve often found artists and curators quite lucid about the real impact that art can have on political, economical or social issues. Public Servants confirmed the diffuse awareness of art limitations. Still, there is also a lot of energy and determination in these essays. The authors, especially the artists, believe in the importance of weaving together the symbolic and the pragmatic, of using art to build platforms for nuanced debates about complex problems, of collaborating with communities and harnessing their knowledge and skills.

I think that this sentence that artist Pablo Helguera wrote in his essay sums up quite adequately the spirit of the book:

“Artists seldom have the resources to create societal change on a grand scale, but we can produce pilots, models, or smaller gestures that, if expanded, could truly effect change.”

The book is divided into six ‘departments’ that echo the divisions of governmental oversight. There is also a portfolio section in which a series of artists have been invited to articulate their own relationship with the themes explored in the book.

Here’s a quick walk through the 6 departments:

0aaagazzzz009
Forensic Architecture, Gaza Book of Destruction, subtitled A Verification of Building-Destruction Resulting from Attacks by the Israeli Occupation, is a people’s archive in which every building destroyed or damaged in Israeli attacks has been chronicled

The first department, Public Works, shows how artists are constantly re-imagining the public sector and submitting it to a bit of DIY action in order to breathe new life into abandoned buildings and areas (while juggling the need to avoid gentrification.)

06-23-63rd-and-marshfield-facing-west-chris-murphy_web
Photo Requests from Solitary. My Auntie’s House on the Block. Photo by Chris Murphy

csm_1_427bd16a5b
Photo Requests from Solitary, Unfulfilled request

0facility2766
Josh Begley, Prison Map visualizes the architecture of the American prison system using aerial images

image1boyzgirlooo
Ashley Hunt, 94 boys and girls, ages 9 to 18 | Miami-Dade Juvenile Detention Center, Miami, Florida, on 13.5 acres, the third largest youth prison in the U.S.. Part of Degrees of Visibility which records how the spaces that surround prisons and jails show and conceal the scales of mass incarceration in the U.S.

The Department of Security looks at artistic initiatives that contest rather than reinforce current governmental notions of security. With a particular focus on mass incarceration in the US, brutal police system, racial terror in the US, criminalization of poverty and vicious forms of militarized repression on black youth, etc.

5-4_manifesto_wage_image
W.A.G.E., Artist Payment Graphic, excerpt from W.A.G.E. graphic poster of artist survey results, 2011

The Department of Labor and Economy reflects on alternative modes of value and the social sustainability (or rather lack thereof) of art practices.

I was particularly touched by the contribution of Lise Soskolne from Working Artists and the Greater Economy (W.A.G.E.), an activist group and non-profit organization whose mission is “currently focused on regulating the payment of artist fees by nonprofit art institutions and establishing a sustainable model for best practices between artists and the institutions that contract their labor.”

The editors of the book offered a small fee to include a 5,000 word essay written by W.A.G.E, but asked her to wave the fee ‘due to the scholarly nature’ of the project. Soskolne wrote a considerate answer in which she explained that it wasn’t possible. She had to chose between rejecting the significant career ‘opportunity’ of having her work included in an important publication and sticking to her ethos and values. She chose ethics and only her answer to the editors’ request was published. Smart!

libreria_hag-37
Pablo Helguera, Libreria Donceles, 2015. An itinerant, Spanish-language second-hand bookstore, created in 2013 out of a desire to address the lack of outlets that serve the growing Hispanic and Latino communities in the United States

The Department of Education engages with the State’s sharp disinvestment in education (and particularly art education) and the concomitant neoliberal corporatization of the sector which makes access to education anything but democratic and egalitarian and opens up the gates of research funding to the poisonous influence of the oil, bank and pharmaceutical industries.

635963498830402519-2007733386_tumblr_n20gccjfg81rj6hkro1_1280
Tue Greenfort, Exceeding 2 Degrees, 2007. The temperature inside the museum was raised by 2°C. The money saved on heating costs was used to purchase an area of Ecuadorian rainforest

sonfitalan-viewofthetimelandscape-1978
Alan Sonfist, Time Landscape, 1965-1978-Present. The artist created a forest with plants that were native to the New York City area in pre-colonial times. Photo via issues and images

The Department of Health and Environment looks at the well-being of the citizens and of the planet they inhabit. It is probably the chapter in which the expression ‘symbolic gesture’ came the most frequently to my mind.

Pedro Reyes, The People’s United Nations (pUN), General Assembly, 2013

The Department of Culture reveals how little the state can be trusted when it comes to administering culture.

citeprh_009_v1
Project Row Houses

0i6i6b1461
Monica Villarreal, MIGRATION IS? at Project Row Houses – Round 41: Process and Action An Exploration of Ideas. Curated by Ryan Dennis

Book review – Public Servants. Art and the Crisis of the Common Good is obviously very US-centered. However, drastic cuts in the public sector and other austerity measures adopted in many European countries mean that the issues and questions investigated in the book pertain to the old continent as well.

If you can’t afford the book or wonder how pertinent it might be to your own practice or research, have a look at the essay A critique of social practice art. What does it mean to be a political artist? by art critic Ben Davis and at the series of responses that the article generated. These texts are part of the book and i found that they illustrate very well many of the debates and questions raised in the MIT Press publication.

I should probably publish a kind of shortlist of books, magazines and online resources dedicated to art and activism soon. And when i do, Public Servants. Art and the Crisis of the Common Good will definitely appear among the first titles i’ll recommend if the theme interests you.

Public Servants: Art and the Crisis of the Common Good is part of the New Museum’s newly relaunched publication series, Critical Anthologies in Art and Culture.

There will be a book launch slash panel event titled Public Servants in the Future Imperfect. A Double Book Launch Co-presented with A Blade of Grass at the New Museum on 26 January 2017.

Image on the homepage: Sam Durant, End White Supremacy. Via artnet.

Source

From animal sensors to Monet as a painter of the anthropocene. 9 things i learnt on the opening day of the HYBRID MATTERs symposium

hm_logo-dfee15ae76931dadea656b538e9873b100bdb6c18860b1ea064a64caabed63d8This week, i’m sure, i’ll finish blogging all the notes and photos and ideas i picked up during the HYBRID MATTERs symposium that took place in Helsinki over a month ago.

HYBRID MATTERs is a Nordic art&science network program that investigates hybrid ecologies, the convergence of our environment with technology and essentially the intentional and unintentional transformation of our planet through human activity. The actors of this hybrid ecology are many. They are genetically engineered plants, cloned trees, animals used as sensors. Or they are robots, software and networks that encroach on the biological and sometimes manage to fuse with it. Some of this hybrid ecology is the direct result of human actions but increasingly, we see signs that biological and technological entities are escaping human control and are transforming the planet.

30public77249_b
The audience of the HYBRID MATTERs symposium. Photo by Petri Tuohimaa

I already profusely wrote about the HYBRID MATTERs exhibition. Today i’ll get to grips with the symposium. All the talks are online. So instead of summing up what each speaker has said, i’m going to highlight a couple of points they made because i found them worth mentioning, rediscovering or simply because they were new to me (Claude Monet as a painter of the anthropocene!)

Three keynote speakers took the stage on the first days of the symposium:

Steen Rasmussen is Professor at the Center for Fundamental Living Technology (FLinT), University of Southern Denmark. A major part of his academic activities involves researching how to create life from scratch, ‘a bit like an alchemist’. That’s what the first part of his talk was about but my notes will be focusing on the second part of his presentation. The one that exposed the potentially radical consequences that BINC technologies will have on our society. I loved his talk, it was lively, enlightening and there was a very ‘combative’ energy to it.

Jussi Parikka, Professor in technological culture & aesthetics at Winchester School of Art (University of Southampton), was the arty one. His talk explored the geophysics of media technologies, the bits and pieces of our planet that lurk inside our electronic gadgets and the role that art can play in making this situation more visible.

Jennifer Gabrys, a Reader in the Department of Sociology at Goldsmith, looked at how animals are increasingly made into sensor nodes and networks that inform us on environmental conditions.

3magnus53aeea_b
Steen Rasmussen at the HYBRID MATTERs symposium. Photo by Petri Tuohimaa

HYBRID MATTERs 24.11.2016 Keynote Steen Rasmussen

We’re going to kick off with Steen Rasmussen‘s talk Welcome to the BINC-Age: The brave new world of living and intelligent technologies. What did i retain from it?

1. This is not just another industrial revolution

As the BINC technologies (the biotech, infotech, nanotech, and cogitive-sciences) converge, they will change technology and drive society to radically different places.

Rasmussen believes that we can’t predict where the rapid development of artificial intelligence is going to leave workers.

Several studies have concluded that within the next 15 to 20 years about 50% of all known job functions will be taken over by more efficient informational systems. This means that there are big changes coming up and they cannot be compared to the changes that took place with the automation in factories during the Industrial Revolution. At the time, it was clear what was going on, where the jobs were going: the farming hands were going to be employed in the factories. Today, the outlook is not so clear.

6xqpwt8tsmwazpdaecc5g6cfurepxo3ljpirw3digag
Image found in Stephen Hawking: This will be the impact of automation and AI on jobs

30483112563_879fc64a69_b
Slide from Steen Rasmussen’s keynote listing the ways in which the BINC economy will be different from the economy of the Industrial Revolution

2. In this new economy, we can make profit without production

A key element of the new economy is that we can make profit without production. This has never happened before.

Compare the sale of these two Swedish companies. Minecraft, which had 40 employees, was sold for 14 billion Swedish crowns and Volvo, with its 23 000 employees, for 7 billion crowns only.

3minecrafed5f21e_b
Slide from Steen Rasmussen’s keynote

Today, the leaders of the BINC economy are google, microsoft, amazon, etc. Unlike General Motors, they don’t have million of employees. All the rules we’ve known for so long don’t apply anymore. If we look at history, all the major changes of production, communication and transport were accompanied by important changes in our institution and economical sector. BINC technologies have the potential to do the same to our current post-industrial world.

Rasmussen believes that the BINC transition is more fundamental and that it is akin to the transitions humanity experienced going from hunter gathers to agriculture.

3. It’s more complicated than ‘post-truth’. There are different conceptions about the nature of truth

Rasmussen has tried to engage with institutions such as the EU commission, the German Parliament, the Danish Parliament, etc. He tried to start a discussion with policymakers about how these BINC technologies are about to change the world. He soon realized that the issues related to the impact of BINC are not part of policymakers’s main interests. Why is that?

Part of the explanation might be found in what we call ‘truth.’

Truth cannot be absolute because it is ultimately coloured by your underlying interests. People from the field of humanities will have a deep interest in understanding fellow men. Those from natural and engineering sciences will have a deep interest in controlling nature. Whereas, people with a background in social sciences will have a deep interest in becoming free from oppression.

There is only one scientist among the 179 members of the Danish parliament. Besides, Rasmussen doesn’t know of any engineers or natural scientists holding a lead position in the Danish press. All of them are communicators. This means that these are people who believe that truth is relative. As for the increasingly popular social media, they function like echo channels where crazy ideas and misunderstanding take ground. That’s how we end up with ‘post-truth’ as the word of the year in Oxford Dictionary. According to Rasmussem, politicians’ lies (whether we’re talking Brexit or Trump) wouldn’t be taken so seriously if truth wasn’t seen as relative and if our narratives still made sense.

4. We need to start producing new narratives

His conclusion is that we need to tell stories about ‘the new brave world of BINC.’ Or someone else, with their own idea of ‘truth’, might do it for us. These narratives should explore questions such as:

30politicsoughtotbeab31486a8_b
Slide from Steen Rasmussen’s keynote

Jussi Parikka’s talk, For a Damaged Planet: Slow Violence in the Age of Fast Computation explored the geographies of supply chains that make out technological possible (but also highly toxic for the environment and for workers living in far away countries.)

3jussi61e92eda_b
Jussi Parikka at the HYBRID MATTERs symposium. Photo by Petri Tuohimaa

HYBRID MATTERs 24.11.2016 Keynote Jussi Parikka

5. The contemporary is not the present

It is the result of the collaboration of different registers of time. War is a good example. A war cannot be summarized in human casualties, it is an entanglement of social and natural history and parts of it remain around us, as residues of a slow chemical violence that permeate the soil, in the air, long after peace treaties have been signed.

World War I was a mass mobilization of new technologies that came to define the 20th century in so many ways. Wrist watches, for example. Or the technologies of chemical warfare that were deployed so effectively during the war and would later provide the backbone of the pesticide industry. Both are still with us today.

slide_9materials
The dynamics of two decades of computer chip technology development and its mineral and element impacts. In the 1980s, computer chips were made with a palette of twelve minerals or their elemental components. A decade later, 16 elements were employed. Today, as many as 60 different minerals (or their constituent elements) may be used in fabricating the high-speed, high-capacity integrated circuits that are crucial to this technology. SOURCE: Intel Corporation

6. We need to start looking at hardware again

We need to be aware of what hardware infrastructure does to our world because it is part and parcel of this slow media violence.

100 years ago we relied on a couple of key materials (wood, iron, copper, etc.) The 20th century saw the arrival of plastics. Meanwhile, a broad variety of minuscule elements that are crucial for our technological society have appeared and they require new minerals. Computer chips, for example, demands dozens of minerals. The extraction, transport, processing and production of these minerals is key to our technological culture. It is also highly damaging for the environment and for the labour conditions of human beings who are invisible to us. We’ve all heard of coltan. The case of earth minerals might be less well-known. They are part of the production of electronic objects and their extraction and processing involve great costs for the environment.

0he-edge-of-the-lithium-pools_liam-young
Unknown Fields, Lithium Dreams

A work like Unknown Fields’s Rare Earthenware visualizes this toxic violation of the planet. One of Unknown Fields’s most recent works explores lithium, a metal seen as essential to the development of ‘green technologies’. Its extraction and production, however, come with toxic ecological consequences.

7.The Anthropocene plays a part in our visual culture

0impression-sunrise
Claude Monet, Impression, Sunrise, 1873

Unknown Fields’ work fulfills very well this role of making the anthropocene more tangible. But we can reinterpret art history under the light of this new era. In his essay, Visualizing the Anthropocene, Nicholas Mirzoeff explores how art can visualize the Anthropocene. Part of his text revisits key works of art history. For example, he invites us to re-interpret Claude Monet’s painting Impression, Sunrise and see the particular light that bathes the scene painted as the result of industrial smog, a registering of the afterglow of the coal-based economy. With this work, Monet is a painter of pollution.

Jennifer Gabrys‘s talk was titled Animals as Sensors. Mobile Organisms and the Problem of Milieus. Its content drew on her book Program Earth. Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet which looks at sensor technologies distributed in the environment and how they weave new relationships with the environment and make the Earth programmable.

3sabine3bd5ca82_b
Jennifer Gabrys at the HYBRID MATTERs symposium. Photo by Petri Tuohimaa

HYBRID MATTERs 24.11.2016 Keynote Jennifer Gabrys

Gabry’s talked focused on one particular chapter of the book, the one that explores ‘animal sensing’ and how animals are sensors themselves of large scale phenomena.

8. Sensors distributed in the environment are not just sensing worlds but making worlds

You can sense climate change through the way moss is responding to its environment. Similarly, the tagging of animals informs not only the journeys these animals take during their migrations but also the environment that they inhabit. For example, Southern Ocean seals tagged to capture ocean data are also indicators of longer term shifts in climate. Sensors can pick up any disruption in the behaviour of the animals, in their habitats, in the place where they go to die, etc. This data will then inform policy and management decisions.

9. Citizens can play a part in animal sensing

The Max Planck Institute for Ornithology has released a tracking app that allows you to follow the movements of wild animals all over the world in near-real time. These movements are collected by tiny GPS tags carried by the animals and are stored on a free online infrastructure used by researchers to share, analyze, and archive animal movement data. With this tool for citizen engagement, people are invited to participate in the research projects and upload real-life observations and photos of the tagged animals.

The HYBRID MATTERs symposium was a collaboration between the Bioartsociety and the MA in Ecology and Contemporary Performance, Theatre Academy of the University of the Arts Helsinki.

The event was part of the HYBRID MATTERs Nordic art&science network program which investigates the convergence of our environment with technology and essentially the intentional and unintentional transformation of our planet through human activity. The program took the form of a series of researches, encounters, art commissions, exhibitions and a symposium.

Previously: HYBRID MATTERs exhibition: when biological and technological entities escape our control and transform the planet, Albedo Dreams. Experiments in DIY climate manipulation, HYBRID MATTERs: The urks lurking beneath our feet and The Christmas tree, your typical postnatural organism.

Photo on the homepage from Unknown Fields, Lithium Dreams.

Source

Though Not Scientific, Trump's Media Survey Reinforces Resentment of Press


One day after an epic press conference during which President Donald Trump repeatedly criticized and diminished long-respected media outlets such as CNN as purveyors of “fake news,” his still-operating campaign arm and the Republican National Committee have reinforced their media-as-opposition message by disseminating a “Mainstream Media Accountability Survey” to supporters.

Some professional market researchers and GOP pollsters suggest that despite its appearance, the survey is nothing more than a means of egging on supporters to cough up more data, and questioned its validity.

“You would never use data from a biased sample of email list subscribers as a replacement for traditional public opinion research, and that’s not likely what they’re using it for,” said Patrick Ruffini, co-founder of Republican research firm Echelon Insights and former RNC digital strategy director. “Given the fact that Trump can’t stop talking about the ‘lying media,’ I suspect this is one of the better tools in their arsenal to land people on a donation page after taking the survey.”

Continue reading at AdAge.com

Celebrate President's Day! Be a Patriot and Buy a Mattress!


Ah, President’s Day. The time when all good Americans hail to the chief by purchasing a new car, dining room table or spring-coil mattress.

Around this time each year, local retailers and car dealers break out the limited-time only offers to move the metal and the boxsprings with hard-sell spots, often with clumsy and hilarious results. This year, given the new administration, some are even trying to be intentionally comic.

Here, we look at some of the current crop of President’s Day pitches:

Continue reading at AdAge.com

Day 2 of HYBRID MATTERs symposium: Root brain, post-fossil culture & why we need to stick with our mess


Kristina Lindström and Åsa Ståhl, Plastic Imaginaries, 2016. Photo: Anna Autio

Finally! A few notes from what might very well have been the most exciting and eye-opening conference of 2016: the HYBRID MATTERs symposium that took place in Helsinki over a month ago. As Erich Berger (an artist, curator and the director of the Bioartsociety) explains in the video below, the symposium was the conclusion of a 2 year project that used artistic and scientific research to look at the material conditions and transformative power of human activity over the environment.

This research focused on hybrid ecologies, the convergence of our environment with technology and essentially the intentional and unintentional transformation of our planet through human activity. Hybrid ecologies unfold through complex interactions between actors and elements: human, non-human, biological, mineral, robotic, artificial, etc. There has always been some forms of interaction between humans and their immediate biological environment (through agriculture, bee keeping, fermentation techniques, etc.) but contemporary science is speeding up the synergies and frictions. To the point that the biological itself becomes technological and technologically-altered and the result begins to feedback in the environment.

HYBRID MATTERs not only registered these interactions but also questioned their meaning and implications. The program also attempted to delineate the position of mankind in these new ecologies. Should we keep on thinking of nature as something independent from us and from our activities? Or should we recognize that we drive much of this process and need take responsibility for it?

HYBRID MATTERs by Erich Berger on 25 November 2016

What made the event so interesting for me was that it suggested a new perspective on the Anthropocene discourse. It looked beyond the usual (and of course justified) alarmist attitude and proposed other approaches to this new geological age.

Not only are we starting to realize that we can’t fully control the planet but we also have to come to terms with the fact that the life that we’ve created (almost) from scratch is being slowly released into the world, interacting with the environment in sometimes unpredictable ways and becoming an integral part of it. We need to start thinking about how we, the humans, can co-evolve in a more sympathetic and mutually beneficial way with other living entities and global phenomena.

The symposium also reminded us that the environment is not just a passive victim of human greed and foolishness, it is also a sophisticated assemblage of interconnected, highly adaptive systems and entities that can work for us, with us but also without us. Maybe the time has come for us to broaden our definition of the environment and accept that nature cannot be contained into a romantic ideal of a pristine, untouched, virginal world.

The most inspiring day of the short symposium was Day 2, the panel day. Artists, researchers, curators, biologists, bioroboticists, archaeologists got together and discussed passionately about how we should start developing a language to visualize, narrate and understand eclectic but interconnected topics that range from plant awareness to big bacteria, from autistic conception of the economy to plastic trash on beaches, from de-extinction to tulipomania.

The videos of the whole symposium are online so my notes are not going to cover everything that was said. Instead, i’m going to adopt a very subjective approach, recording few key ideas and concepts, a few artworks and research practices that i believe deserve to be highlighted.

HMs panel on Plant subjectivities, assemblies and assemblages with Kira O’Reilly, Laura Beloff, Jens Hauser, Monika Bakke. 25 November 2016

The panel on plant subjectivities was composed of artist and leader of the MA in Ecology and Contemporary Performance at the Theatre Academy of the University of the Arts Helsinki Kira O’Reilly, artist and researcher Laura Beloff, art curator and media studies scholar Jens Hauser as well as writer and editor Monika Bakke from the Adam Mickiewicz University, in Pozna?.

Together, the panelists discussed the natural and post-natural hybridity of plants.

Monika Bakke talked about plantoids, plant farming in space, plant sexuality but i was especially fascinated by her brief introduction to plant intelligence. In 1880 already, Charles and his son Francis Darwin were talking about a ‘root-brain’. Contemporary research confirms the existence of this root brain, it is a decentralized communicative network that enables plants to behave as multitude and manifest a kind of swarm intelligence. They also exhibit a certain awareness of the world around them.

147705538947961
Cunninghamia, one of the Eocene trees, growing in Oliver Kellhammer’s garden on Cortes Island. Image: Daniel J. Pierce. Photo: motherboard

Another remarkable feature of plants is that they are more resilient to events leading to extinction than animals. Artist Oliver Kellhammer is looking at this resilience. His project Neo-Eocene focuses on plant species that have survived through multiple geological periods. Charles Darwin called them living fossils. The artist is trying to recreate forests made of living fossils trees in Canada. These trees used to be native to the area and they thus connect distant geological epochs with a future significantly modified by global warming. The future after all may belong to those species that have already proved to be able to overcome extraordinary climate conditions.

I bloody love that project, by the way!

Jens Hauser talked about microperformativity, a term he has been using since 2010 to describe a shift in scale towards molecules, cells, proteins, bacteria, viruses, etc. This shift away from the human body redefines what we consider to be a body and can also be interpreted as a blow to human narcissism.


Yann Marussich, Bleu Remix, 2007. Photo by Isabelle Meister

0stembera_petrjpgstembera07
Petr Stembera Graft, Graft, 1975. “In a manner customary in fruit-farming, I grafted a branch taken from a shrub to my arm”. Photo: Kontakt

Hauser also discussed plantamorphization, another ‘bioart trend’ which consists in adopting characteristics of the vegetative at large, shifting the attention from movement to growth. An example of this type of practice is Yann Marussich’s iconic performance Bleu Remix. I was less familiar with the work of Petr Stembera who, in the 1970s, grafted a bush sprig into his arm.

Titled Survival of the Prettiest, Laura Beloff‘s talk explored evolution: from natural selection to artificial selection and towards aesthetic selection. More precisely how biological organisms are being designed and selected based on aesthetic criteria that are deeply intertwined with our capitalistic world. An early example of that is the 17th century tulipomania in The Netherlands.

earlier-images-of-salmofan-roche_edwardtufte-com
DSM SalmoFan™. Image via Quartz

A contemporary occurrence of this new spin on evolution is farmed salmon. Clients visiting a farm are invited to selected their ideal salmon colour flesh from a DSM SalmoFan™, a colour card specially developed by a pharmaceutical company for Salmonids. Depending on the precise hue the clients want the flesh to be, the farmer will adjust the colouring added to the food given to the fish which, in turn, will determine how orange or red the salmon will be.

HMs panel Hybrid Growth with Jonas Jørgensen, Merja Penttilä, Paavo Jarvensivu and Maarja Kruusmaa. 25 November 2016

The Hybrid Growth panel explored the hybrid nature of the term growth and its meaning in nature, technology and economics.

In her talk Living Factories: Synthetic Biology for a Sustainable World, research biologist Merja Penttilä explained how synthetic biology could enable us to replace petrochemicals with renewable raw material, while retaining biodiversity and genetic diversity and using contained production systems.

Post-doc researcher in economic culture and member of Mustarinda (a collective currently focusing on post-fossil fuel culture) Paavo Jarvensivu believes that we need to get rid of the current abstract, narrow and autistic conception of the economy. Currently, society has to match economic indicators (inflation, budget deficit, employment rate, etc.) and this is wrong.

We seem to think that there is lack of money but no limit of resources. What would happen if we took things upside down and assumed that there is unlimited money but limited resources?

Professor of biorobotics Maarja Kruusmaa looked at Growth and Information Technology. It was brilliant and often funny. The growth the title of her talk alludes to is the growth in data. From people who don’t seem to get tired of measuring themselves (a trend called quantified self) to robots (‘they are just sensors with hands and legs’), data multiplies fast.

Growth in data means bigger and bigger server farms and other heavy material infrastructure to preserve it.

Kruusmaa (half-jokingly) suggested that maybe people are going start thinking of saving energy by creating less data or by being more creative with the way they produce this data. For example, by taking black & white pictures rather than colour ones as they are less pixel-hungry and thus consume less bits and bytes.

HMs panel In the Aftermath with Kristina Lindström, Åsa Ståhl, Thora Petursdottir, Björn Wallsten. 25 November 2016

The panel In the Aftermath was another brilliant one. It invited us to look at technological development under a new perspective. Not the prevalent one that champions ideas of progress and novelty but one that considers processes of decay, erosion, breakdown and mouldering. I’ve already written about Björn Wallsten‘s introduction to the world of urks and i mentioned Kristina Lindström and Åsa Ståhl exploration of plastiglomerates and styrofoam-eating worms in my review of the Hybrid Matters exhibition. I still had to talk about the equally fascinating work of Þóra Pétursdóttir.


Drift Matter. Photo: object matters


Drift Matter. Photo: Þóra Pétursdóttir via CAS Oslo

Pétursdóttir, a postdoctoral researcher at the Arctic University of Norway, is an archaeologist from a branch of archaeology that looks at the recent past and the contemporary.

An interesting point that she made was that archaeology has always been about the anthropocene. It is completely reliant on our footprint, on our pollution.

A particular focus of her research is the phenomenon of “the drift beach“, the marine debris that drift and cluster along the Arctic coastlines. Drift matter is a one of the most urgent environmental problems across the world. It is particularly interesting to study its history and meaning in Northern Norway and Iceland. Both have a long heritage of using this material and until recently, this drift matter was considered a natural resource and also a part of the environment. It used to include a lot of wood which was collected and used by the inhabitants as these regions are sparsely forested. The composition of the material has changed drastically over the last century and so has the attitude towards the drift material and the drift beach. It is now regarded as a hazard, an intrusion on the environment.

Marine debris is an environmental problem but, Pétursdóttir argues, it is also part of the environment, it cannot be eliminated from it. This material has never been considered of archaeological interest because it evades the kind of logic that archaeologists expect from their material: they are only interested in waste that has been intentionally deposited, that relates to specific culture or group of people, waste that is traceable, that construct a progressive human history. The drift material doesn’t comply with this nice, linear history.

The interest of drift material is that it suggests unexpected alliances and other notions of environment. It endlessly wanders, gathers and bonds outside our control and may thus contribute to a less anthropocentric and more ecological heritage conception.

HYBRID MATTERs Response to the day by Oron Catts. 25 November 2016

Oron Catts is an artist, researcher and curator. He is the director of SymbioticA. Together with Ionat Zurr, he is also a visiting professor of Contestable Design at the Royal College of Art in London (head to this video if you’re curious about Contestable Design.) Catts wrapped up the discussions of the HYBRID MATTERs symposium. His closing remarks were incisive, and appropriately provocative. I’ll just point to a couple of them:

“We try to rationalize things but we are totally irrational ourselves so how could we design rational independently autonomous system without fucking it up? We can’t!”

“Any attempt to try and assert control over autonomous system is a violent act. And we are all engaged in this violence.”

“Hybrid might not be right metaphor. Maybe parasite would be a more appropriate one.”

“Europe is increasingly scary. The kind of funding that is currently given to artists to engage in crossover between living systems, technology systems, society and culture are neoliberal and driven by bankrupt political systems.”

At that point, he also mentioned that a few art and technology festivals look more like trade shows than art events. I just wanted to jump on the stage and hug him!

“Maybe we need less white people. The world has been repeatedly fucked over by middle aged, middle class white men. I’m one of them so maybe you should listen to other people.”

The HYBRID MATTERs symposium was a collaboration between the Bioartsociety and the MA in Ecology and Contemporary Performance, Theatre Academy of the University of the Arts Helsinki.

The event was part of the HYBRID MATTERs Nordic art&science network program which investigates the convergence of our environment with technology and essentially the intentional and unintentional transformation of our planet through human activity. The program took the form of a series of researches, encounters, art commissions, exhibitions and a symposium.

Previously: From animal sensors to Monet as a painter of the anthropocene. 9 things i learnt on the opening day of the HYBRID MATTERs symposium, HYBRID MATTERs exhibition: when biological and technological entities escape our control and transform the planet, Albedo Dreams. Experiments in DIY climate manipulation, HYBRID MATTERs: The urks lurking beneath our feet and The Christmas tree, your typical postnatural organism.

Source

The Nuclear Culture Source Book

nuclear-culture-coverThe Nuclear Culture Source Book, edited by Ele Carpenter, a curator, writer and one of the driving forces behind the Nuclear Culture Research Group.

On amazon USA and UK.

Black Dog Publishing writes: The Nuclear Culture Source Book is a resource and introduction to nuclear culture, one of the most urgent themes within contemporary art and society, charting the ways in which art and philosophy contribute to a cultural understanding of the nuclear. The book brings together contemporary art and ideas investigating the nuclear Anthropocene, nuclear sites and materiality, along with important questions of radiological inheritance, nuclear modernity and the philosophical concept of radiation as a hyperobject.

This book was published at the end of last year. 5 years after the Fukushima disaster. 30 years after Chernobyl. Even Fukushima sounds like a distant memory now but if we start to think in terms of nuclear deep time (where the safety of the storage of radioactive waste underground has to be guaranteed for the next hundreds of thousands of years if not far more), it actually happened less than a micro second ago.


Merilyn Fairskye, Plant Life (Chernobyl) Reactor 4

The Nuclear Culture Source Book contains artworks and essays that attempt to respond to the current nuclear age. This is an age characterized by an environment made radiological by the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents. But also by the long term effects of the fallout from weapon testing and the thorny issue of long-term storage and occasional leaking of nuclear waste repositories. Add to the picture, a vast infrastructure involving mining, energy production, waste transport, etc.

How do we take responsibility for high-level waste that has to be kept safe from earthquakes, climate change, volcanic activity and container corrosion for up to one million years? Is this even possible? Do we risk forgetting this nuclear background when its vast timescale exceeds our own understanding of time? When radiation cannot be perceived directly by our human senses? Will we ever stopped being haunted by a threat that remains invisible, odourless, silent?

This book illustrates the role of art in creating a visual sensory framework that helps us grapple with nuclear culture. It also demonstrates that there are ways to approach, debate and articulate the many political, aesthetical and social issues surrounding a phenomenon that eclipses our standard notions of time, materiality and danger.


Thomson & Craighead, Temporary Index, 2016. Image: Arts Catalyst

The Nuclear Culture Source Book accompanies the exhibition Perpetual Uncertainty at the Bildmuseet in Umea, Sweden, but it offers far more than your usual exhibition catalogue. It presents more artworks than the exhibition does and it contains outstanding essays. I was particularly fascinated by a text in which artist and writer Susan Schuppli so eloquently exposes facts i had never heard about such as the spontaneous nuclear fission of an uranium deposit in Gabon two billion years ago or Sweden’s role in forcing the Soviet Union to officially announce the Chernobyl disaster.

Dark nuclear times have suddenly been brought back to our minds now that there’s an obtuse and raving lunatic in control of the U.S. nuclear weapons arsenal. A book like The Nuclear Culture Source Book is not going to make us feel better about the future of the world but it might at least enable us to face it with a better informed and clearer head. I highly recommend that you browse the publication if you get a chance. It’s only January but i’m already pretty sure that this one is going to be among my favourite books of 2017.

A quick run through some of the works i discovered in the book:


Trevor Paglen, Trinity Cube. Installation view, Don’t Follow the Wind, 2015. Image via elephant mag

Trevor Paglen’s Trinity Cube brings together two key moments in the nuclear age. The Fukushima disaster and the early experiments of nuclear weapons. The outer layer of this jewel-like cube is made of irradiated broken glass collected from inside the Fukushima Exclusion Zone. The inner core of the sculpture is made out of Trinitite, the mineral created on 16 July, 1945 when the U.S. exploded the world’s first atomic bomb in New Mexico, heating the desert’s surface to the point where it sand turned into glass.

The cube can be found inside the Fukushima Exclusion Zone as part of the Don’t Follow the Wind project. The artwork will be viewable by the public when the Exclusion Zone opens again, anytime between 3 and 30,000 years from the present.

Isao Hashimoto, 1945-1998

Isao Hashimoto made a simple but strikingly disturbing time-lapse animation of the 2,053 nuclear explosions on earth between 1945 and 1998, beginning with the Manhattan Project’s “Trinity” test near Los Alamos and concluding with Pakistan’s nuclear tests in May 1998. The video leaves out all tests since 1998.


Jane and Louise Wilson, The Toxic Camera, Konvas Autovat, 2012. Photo: likeyou

Jane and Louise Wilson, The Toxic Camera, 2012

The Toxic Camera is inspired by the film Chernobyl: A Chronicle of Difficult Weeks made by Vladimir Shevchenko in the days immediately following the accident. The film crew was the first in the disaster zone following the meltdown of the power plant on April 26, 1986. They shot continuously for more than 3 months, documenting the disaster’s impact on the local population and the cleanup efforts. Radiation levels were so high that parts of the film were marked with white blotches from radiation. Shevchenko died from radiation exposure before the film was released. As for his 35mm Konvas Avtomat camera, it was so highly radioactive that it had to be buried on the outskirts of Kiev.

The Wilsons’ film explores interconnecting stories from interviews conducted with Chernobyl survivors and with Shevchenko’s colleagues, 25 years after the incident.


Morris&Co fabric, Tudor Rose, 1883, used to upholster British nuclear submarine interiors. Photo: Nuclear Culture

The Morris & Co company’s ‘Strawberry Thief’ fabric was used to upholster British Nuclear Submarines from the early 1960s to the mid-1990s.
It seems that, like many other Victorian manufacturers, Morris & Co produced wallpapers rich in pigments such as locally mined arsenic green. However, due to the action of damp mould, the wallpapers emit poisonous gases which made the occupants of houses ill. William Morris apparently refused to believe that this was the case, and only reluctantly gave up producing such wallpapers.


Taryn Simon, Black Square XVII, 2006–ongoing. Void for artwork. Permanent installation at Garage Museum of Contemporary Art, Moscow

In the year 3015, a black square made from vitrified nuclear waste will occupy a now empty space in at Garage Museum of Contemporary Art in Moscow. The nuclear waste is made of organic liquids, inorganic liquids, slurries, and chemical dusts from a nuclear plant in Kursk as well as from pharmaceutical and chemical plants in the greater Moscow region. Through a process of vitrification, radioactive waste will be compacted and solidified into a mass resembling polished black glass. This mass is currently stored in a concrete reinforced steel container, within a holding chamber surrounded by clay-rich soil, at the Radon nuclear waste disposal plant in Sergiev Posad, 72 km northeast of Moscow. It will remain there until its radioactive properties have lowered to levels deemed safe for human exposure. Cast within the black square is also a cylindrical steel capsule containing a letter to the future written by Taryn Simon.

The work is part of the Black Square series, a collection of objects, documents, and individuals within a black field that has precisely the same measurements as Kazimir Malevich’s 1915 painting of the same name.


Hilda Hellström, The Materiality of a Natural Disaster (video still), 2012. Image via cfile daily


Hilda Hellström, The Materiality of a Natural Disaster

Hilda Hellstrom, The Materiality of a Natural Disaster

Hilda Hellström’s The Materiality of a Natural Disaster is a set of radioactive food kitchen artifacts made from soil and clay taken from the exclusion zone surrounding the Daiichi nuclear power plants in Fukushima, Japan. The objects are irradiated, but within “allowable” levels. Hellström collected the irradiated soil with Naoto Matsumura, a former rice farmer and the last resident living inside the exclusion zone. The pots are accompanied by a video that documents Naoto Matsumura’s daily routine. He lives without water nor electricity on his land that won’t be farmable for at least thirty years.


Ken + Julia Yonetani, Crystal Palace, 2013. The Great Exhibition of the Works of Industry of all Nuclear Nations

Crystal Palace is comprised of 31 chandeliers, as many as there are nuclear nations in the world. The size of each chandelier reflects the number of operating nuclear plants in that nation. Antique chandelier frames have been refitted with uranium glass and UV lighting. Once switched on, the UV bulbs cause the glass beads to glow with an eerie green. The title of the work references the grandiose building designed for the Great Exhibition of 1851 in London, alluding to human ambition, technological development and the costs and consequences that inevitably accompany them.


Suzanne Treister, NATO 2004-ongoing. From the series NATO


Shuji Akagi, Fukushima Traces, 2011-2013. Photo via Osiris

Shuji Akagi’s Fukushima Traces chronicles the city’s decontamination process and life after the tsunami. His visual diary and annotations reveal governmental billboards of encouragement to the population, contaminated soil from playgrounds and sports fields dug up and covered with blue tarpaulin, trees stripped bare to remove contaminated leaves and branches, cracks on the road, etc.

In the book of the project, Akagi writes: “I would like to record as much of what happened within the sphere of my everyday life. No matter how the media would cover the shining city-scape in the glow of recovery, I want to document the lingering scars of my surroundings.”


Brian McGovern Wilson and Robert Williams, Cumbrian Alchemy, 2014

Cumbrian Alchemy, by Brian McGovern Wilson and Robert Williams, explores the connections between the nuclear industry of the Energy Coast in Cumbria and Lancashire and the archaeology and folklore of the region. The performance in the photo above was inspired by Thomas Sebeok‘s proposal in 1984 that an Atomic Priesthood of physicists, anthropologists, semioticians and other experts could be effective in communicating information over vast expanses of time.


smudge studio, Look Only at the Movement (route map), 2012-15


smudge studio, Look Only at the Movement (digital stills), 2012-15

In 2012, Elizabeth Ellsworth and Jamie Kruse from smudge studio followed the routes along which nuclear waste is moved in the American West from sites of waste generation to disposal stations. Equipped with a car-mounted video camera, they documented storage infrastructures and engineered landscapes such as the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, where nuclear weapons research is conducted; the former site of a plutonium plant in Colorado; the Department of Energy’s TRANSCOM in Carlsbad, New Mexico, which monitors, 24/7 and via satellite, the transportation of nuclear waste in trucks; the uranium tailings disposal cell at Mexican Hat in Utah and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico, America’s only deep geologic repository where nuclear waste is buried 1,250 feet below the surface in a salt dome, etc.

Look Only at the Movement exposes the encounters of two worlds that seem to ignore each other: the travelers on the American Highway and the network of nuclear waste transport, disposal cells, and sites of remediation. It also demonstrates how the movement of nuclear waste through public spaces is (and will long continue to be) a condition of contemporary life, landscape, and infrastructure design. Yet, citizens, architects, and engineers have virtually no models for how to design and maintain infrastructures capable of safely containing nuclear materials for the millions of years required by their potency.

The Nuclear Culture Project was initiated by Arts Catalyst in collaboration with Ele Carpenter. The book is co-published by Black Dog, Bildmuseet and Arts Catalyst.

The exhibition Perpetual Uncertainty is at the Bildmuseet in Umea (Sweden) until 16 April 2017.

Included in the exhibition: Inheritance, a precious heirloom made of gold and radioactive stones.

Related stories: High-Speed Horizons. Using sonic booms and nuclear energy to power aviation, Anecdotal radiations, the stories surrounding nuclear armament and testing programs, Relics of the Cold War.

Source

Air Slaves. Could we one day ‘lend our lungs’ to filter polluted air?

“Prepare for a future in which the only way of making a living is to ‘lend your lung’ to filter heavily polluted air. Clean Air International Inc. is looking for suppliers for its first Organic Clean Air (TM) retail store.”


Air Slaves. Image courtesy of Let it Be! art agency

Air Project. Work-in-progress demo on 25 September 2012, Labor, Budapest

Visitors of the Air Slaves exhibition which opens next Monday in Berlin will be invited to cover their mouth with a mask and walk around the space freely.

Throughout their stay in the gallery, their expiration will slowly inflate and fill in the plastic container attached to the mask. As each visitor exits the space, their bag will be sealed, carefully labelled and stored inside the Organic Clean Air depository along with the exhalations of previous visitors.

Hanging side by side, these “second-lung air” containers will build up a “lung-print” of human presence in the space.

Air Slaves is a speculative art installation that uses air as a metaphor for access to natural resources and reflects on a future in which good quality air has become so rare and valuable, it has become a commodity, not a basic right and necessity. A suggestion that appears to be a reality in some of the most polluted cities in the world.

Family sell British fresh air to wealthy Chinese elite for £80 a jar


A Chinese woman wears a mask and filter as she walks to work during heavy pollution on December 9, 2015 in Beijing, China. Photo: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images, via Mashable

This project is thus not about the quality of air as such but about access to it. It points to a future in which natural resources are being commodified and privatized. Just like what happens in certain parts of the world where the answer to water scarcity or poor quality is market-driven. You bottle the water, rather than tackle the problem to its roots.


Air Slaves. Image courtesy of Let it Be! art agency

The members of Let it Be!, the art agency behind the work, found a moment to answer my questions while preparing for the opening of the Air Slaves show in Berlin:

Hi Attila, Melinda, Andrea and Zoltán! Air Project ‘reflects on a future in which fresh air has become extremely rare and valuable.’ I was wondering if you could be more specific and tell us about the kind of concrete future the project is referring to. Do you see signs of this rarefaction or maybe even privatisation of air in society?

Attila Bujdosó: For me, this project is not really about air. We use air as a metaphor to resources, be they natural and social, in general. Also, this project is as much about our present as it is about our future. But talking about the future seems much easier to me because it allows speculation and playfulness without the need to prove our every step scientifically.

Melinda Sipos: Sometimes you feel that the human effects on the natural environment are so extreme that you can imagine this as one final phase before it collapses. We also often spoke about drinking water which is already a product and is an expensive commodity in some areas. And even though light is not crucial to life to live or work in a bright space, especially in a megalopolis, is a sign of wealth.


Air Project. Work-in-progress demo on 25 September 2012, Labor, Budapest


Air Project. Work-in-progress demo on 25 September 2012, Labor, Budapest

You had a first experiment with the project in Budapest back in 2012. How did visitors react to the idea behind the work? Were there surprising ways in which they reacted to or engaged with the work?

Attila: One thing which we anticipated beforehand and turned out to work really well is that participants indeed developed a personal relation to the air they exhaled and we encapsulated. We also took portraits of them, proudly posing with their plastic bags.

This air, however, is not any different biologically from the air they exhale at any time of the day. What the installation showed so well that collecting it and putting it into a plastic bag made them feel a sense of ownership over the air they exhaled. Ownership, thus, is socially constructed, and surprisingly easily constructed.

Melinda: Moreover, we also got into the situation or illusion that people left something valuable behind, a part of them. Before the experiment we concentrated more on the visualisation side of it and when we were left there with all the bags we felt a little embarrassed I think.

And what about their personal experience of the whole process? To me, the plastic mask looks claustrophobic and borderline suicidal but maybe i’m a bit dramatic?

Melinda: No, it does for sure. The whole instrument looks scary and weird. But surprisingly, people’s experience was rather intimate and relaxing. Many of them told us they felt encouraged to slow down by wearing the mask and be conscious about their breath. Breathing is something we don’t pay attention to it usually but the fact that the air was collected plus seeing the plastic bag growing gave it so much attention.


Air Project. Work-in-progress demo on 25 September 2012, Labor, Budapest


Air Project. Work-in-progress demo on 25 September 2012, Labor, Budapest

Could you tell us about the ‘data embodiment’ dimension of the work? We don’t normally associate data with exhaled air so why was it important to you to put a physiological function into a data perspective?

Zoltán Csík-Kovács: That was the first idea where the project originated from. It was on a data embodiment workshop organized by Baltan Laboratories and Kitchen Budapest in 2011. We got inspired by the idea of somehow making the volume and weight of exhaled air from all the people in the room visible and tangible. So we started to think about collecting the exhaled air into plastic bags and the possible ways this could be managed in a framework of a participatory exhibition. A lot of aspects, layers and unique expressions come into view while drafting afterwards like “air as a metaphor of sharing”, or “second-lung air”, or “lungprint”, and of course the question “where is the last breath of Elvis”.

Melinda: To me the fascinating thing about data visualisation in general is that you start seeing and understanding things which were invisible beforehand. Doing that in three dimension makes it even more compelling (this is why we initiated the whole Beyond Data project Zoltan mentioned). And with the air (exhale) it just seemed so impossible and so much on the border of something that can or cannot be shown that we really felt the urge to work with.

What are the little texts at the bottom of the plastic tubes we see in the video?

Zoltán: We asked the participants to write down their own thoughts on a paper that would go along with their packed exhaled air. We sealed the handwritings into the plastic bags so other visitors could read them. What I like the most is the intimacy it creates. While reading their thoughts you can’t help personalizing these empty-like plastic bags and feeling a kind of vacuum that the person left for you. In this way the installation space also gave room for a constant and silent conversation where thoughts followed thoughts within a loosely articulated theme.

Attila: But for the upcoming show in Berlin this will change.

So the project in Berlin will be different from what you presented in Budapest? The text on the facebook page is a bit different, it sounds a bit more radical “Prepare for a future in which the only way of making a living is to ‘lend your lung’ to filter heavily polluted air. Clean Air International Inc. (CAI) is looking for suppliers for its first Organic Clean Air (TM) retail store.”

Zoltán: Yes, it will be different. We will experiment with putting the visitors into and reflecting to well recognized situations in today’s consumer world, like being in a retail shop or being a donor of some medical institute. So consuming goods and being the goods. This time we play a role of a huge company, Clean Air International, that is the only choice for most of the people in a dystopian world to make a living. The whole situation is imaginary but it more accurately reflects upon critical debates of today or approaching in the near future like ecological crisis, artificial intelligence taking jobs from people, wealth inequality, unconditional basic income, etc.

Attila: Yes, the installation will be more radical in Berlin. The world has become more radical, especially since last year, so we reflect on that. It addresses issues on how we will deal with mass-unemployment, ecological change or economic and political shifts.

I’m also quite curious about Let it Be! art agency. What is it exactly? Are you a group of artists? a kind of go between agency that facilitates relationships between artists and tech companies or other private or public entities?

Andrea Kovács: Budapest based Let it Be! art agency is developing new interdisciplinary forms of co-operation between different areas of art and creative industries by exploring possibilities in innovative collaborations. The agency is engaged in managing and initiating cross media and urban city projects which focus on new synergies of art and technology. Our projects are inviting for explorative city journeys, virtual adventures in the augmented reality and offer unique interactive installations and performances.

Air Slaves Berlin is a work-in-progress presentation. It is included in the official program of transmediale and CTM Vorspiel 2017 as part of Collegium Hungaricum Berlin’s Human Signals event series curated by Andrea Kovács, the founder of Let it Be! The thematic programs are focusing on the interactions between human body and different kind of physical and digital surroundings. Human Signals provides interactive installations, biofeedback performances and creative coding workshops such as a pop up exhibition. The invited Hungarian artists are working on methods of data visualisation in different creative fields by using sounds, movements, breathes, heartbeats, memories, touches and feelings. They experiment with possibilities of making visible biological processes and activating our perception and instinct in unique ways.

Thanks Attila, Melinda, Andrea and Zoltán!

The Air Slaves show is open on 6 to 8 Februrary at Collegium Hungaricum in Berlin.

You can register to participate.

Related story: Who owns the air?

Source

Sean Spicer Claims Quebec Mosque Shooting Justifies US Ban of Muslim Travellers From Seven Countries

GettyImages-632599506

Yesterday White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer exploited the terrorist attack in Quebec City to justify President Trump’s ban on Muslim-immigrants from seven countries.

“It’s a terrible reminder of why we must remain vigilant and why the President is taking steps to be proactive rather than reactive when it comes to our nation’s safety and security.”

But these assertions are utterly false. The shooting suspect is 27-year-old Alexandre Bissonnette, a white French Canadian who is a rabid anti-immigrant nationalist.

The inflammatory effect of this sort of reckless, biased “reporting” is as predictable as it is toxic. All day long, people around the world cited the same reports not only cited, but validated by Spicer, to justify Trump’s ban as well as their own ugly views of Muslims.

The only part of any of this that’s true is that it was an act of terrorism: terrorism aimed, yet again, at Muslims by someone who has apparently been indoctrinated with a great deal of hate toward them.

Media outlets and the White House led people all over the world today to believe exactly the opposite.

– Glenn Greenwald and Murtaza Hussain

Read the full story at the Intercept.

The post Sean Spicer Claims Quebec Mosque Shooting Justifies US Ban of Muslim Travellers From Seven Countries appeared first on Adbusters | Journal of the mental environment.

Source

Put up a Fucking Fight

urgency

We will create a subjective figure, one who seeks to go beyond the domination of globalized capital without falling into nihilism. And in order for this to take place, peculiar alliances must be forged; we must think on another scale. Intellectuals, and different segments of youth, must become organically linked by experiments at first local, and then wider. What matters is that youths and intellectuals of every provenance make a gesture, carve out a path, and take a step.

There is an urgency here, but it is a strategic urgency.

It is a task, a task for us all. It is a work of thought, but it is also the work, the path, of going to see who is this other of whom you speak, who they really are, to gather their thoughts, their ideas, their vision of things; and for you to inscribe them—them, and you yourself at the same time—within a strategic vision of the destiny of humanity that will try to change the direction of our history and away from the opaque misfortune in which humanity has sunk.

But time is running out. Time is running out…

  Alain Badiou, Our Wound Is Not So Recent

The post Put up a Fucking Fight appeared first on Adbusters | Journal of the mental environment.

Source

Logo of the Day

NFL-logo

Another reason to be critical of the SuperBowl spectacle.

Along with mindless consumerism, advertising as entertainment, and the sheer amount of waste, there is Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. CTE is a degenerative disease that plagues athletes, resulting in death, often by suicide, in almost every case. The NFL logo has been reworked to raise awareness about the suffering inflicted on players who bring millions of people together with their sport. This culture jam serves as a call to return to an authentic celebration of athleticism and a critical analysis of the rampant commercialism that obscures it.

The N.F.L’s Tragic C.T.E Roll Call : www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/03/sports/football/nfl-brain-disease-cte-concussions.html

The post Logo of the Day appeared first on Adbusters | Journal of the mental environment.

Source

Modernity has been a disaster for the Western Mind

splash-rasputin-1

This excerpt from Alexander Dugin’s The Fourth Political Theory was featured in the latest issue of Adbusters. Adbusters #130 takes an in-depth look into the disturbing philosophical roots of the growing Alt-Right movement. Alexander Dugin is a Russian political scientist known for his fascist views.

Modernity and its ideological basis (individualism, liberal democracy, capitalism, consumerism, and so on) are the cause of the future catastrophe of humanity, and the global domination of the Western lifestyle is the reason for the final degradation of the Earth. The West is approaching its terminus, and we should not let it drag the rest of us down into the abyss with it.

Tradition (religion, hierarchy, and family) and its values were overthrown at the dawn of modernity. All three political theories were conceived as artificial ideological constructions by people who comprehended, in various ways, ‘the death of God’ (Nietzsche), the ‘disenchantment of the world’ (Weber), and the ‘end of the sacred.’ This was the core of the New Era of modernity: man came to replace God, philosophy and science replaced religion, and the rational, forceful, and technological constructs took the place of revelation.

When we use the term ‘modernization’, we mean progress, linear accumulation, and a certain continuous process. When we speak of ‘modernization’, we presuppose development, growth, and evolution. It is the same semantic system. Thus, when we speak of the ‘unconditionally positive achievements of modernization: we agree with a very important basic paradigm – we agree with the idea that ‘human society is developing, progressing, evolving, growing, and getting better and better: that is to say, we share a particular vision of historical optimism.

This historical optimism pertains to the three classical political ideologies (liberalism, Communism, and fascism). It is rooted in the scientific, societal, political, and social worldview in the humanities and natural sciences of the Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries, when the ideas of progress, development, and growth were taken as axioms that could not be doubted. In other words, this entire set of axioms, as well as the whole historiography and predictive analytics of the Nineteenth century in the humanities and the natural sciences, were built upon the idea of progress.

Adbusters #130 hits newsstands worldwide Feb 21.

The post Modernity has been a disaster for the Western Mind appeared first on Adbusters | Journal of the mental environment.

Source

The Destruction of the Weak by the Strong

splash-duggin-pt2

Excerpted from The Fourth Political Theory by Russian political scientist Alexander Dugin. Read Part One here.

The sociologist Herbert Spencer claimed that the development of human society was the next stage of evolution in the animal species, and that there was a connection, and a continuity between the animal world and social development.

And, therefore, all the laws of the animal world leading to development, improvement, and evolution in the animal world, within Darwin’s framework, can be projected onto society. This is the basis of the famous theory, ‘Social Darwinism’, of which Spencer was a classic representative. If, according to Darwin, the driving force behind the evolution of the animal kingdom is the struggle for survival and natural selection, then the same process must take place in society, argued Spencer. And, the more perfect this struggle is for survival (inter-species, intra-species, the struggle of the strong against the weak, the competition for resources, pleasure), the more perfect our society becomes. The question is how to aid this process of selection. According to Spencer, this is the central theme of the liberal model, and is the meaning of social progress. Therefore, if we are liberals, in one way or the other, we inherited this ‘zoological’ approach to social development based on the struggle against and the destruction of the weak by the strong.

Spencer’s theory contains an important point that must be elaborated upon. He argued that there are two phases of social development. The first phase occurs when the struggle for survival is conducted crudely, by force; this is characteristic of the ancient world. The second occurs when the struggle is carried out more subtly through economic means. Once the bourgeois revolution takes place, the struggle for survival does not stop. According to Spencer, it acquires new, more advanced, and more efficient forms; it relocates into the sphere of the market. Here, the strongest survive – that is, the richest. Instead of the most powerful feudal lord, a hero, a strong person, or a leader, who simply seizes all that is up for grabs around his community, taking away all that belongs to other nations and races and sharing it with the ruling ethnicity or caste, now comes the capitalist, who brings the same aggressive animal principle to the market, the corporation, and the trading company. The transition from the order of power to the order of money, according to Spencer, does not mean the humanization of the process, but only underscores greater effectiveness. That is to say, the struggle in the market sphere between the strong (meaning rich) and the weak (meaning poor) becomes more efficient and leads to higher levels of development until super-rich, super-strong, and superdeveloped countries emerge. Progress, according to Spencer, and, more broadly speaking, according to liberalism, is always the growth of economic power, since this continues to refine the struggle for survival of the animal species, the warfare methods of strong nations, and the castes within the framework of pre-capitalist states.

Featured in our upcoming issue, The Impeachment, on newsstands worldwide Feb 21. Preorder now.

The post The Destruction of the Weak by the Strong appeared first on Adbusters | Journal of the mental environment.

Source

Listen to the sounds from the deepest hole ever dug into the Earth crust


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Rosa Menkman for Sonic Acts

Last year, while i sat down listening to the speakers of the Open Fields conference in Riga, i learnt about the existence of the Kola Superdeep Borehole, the deepest man-made hole ever dug into the Earth crust.

Lucas van der Velden, director of the fantastic Sonic Acts, was presenting Dark Ecology, a three-year art research and commissioning project which invited participants to re-evalute our definition and relationship to the environment. One of the works commissioned was Justin Bennett’s Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, a sound walk that takes us inside the now abandoned and very decrepit research station in the company of the last worker still living there.

Justin Bennett – Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains. Video: Sonic Acts

The U.S.S.R. started the Kola Superdeep Borehole project in 1970 for geological research but also because when the work started, it was the height of the Cold War and the Soviets wanted to show how superior they were to the U.S.

The researchers were also hoping that the Borehole could become part of a transcontinental network of seismic listening stations that was to function as an early-warning system for imminent earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and other natural disasters but also for picking up on enemy nuclear tests, missile launch, etc.

The team had planned to drill as deep as 15,000 m which would have meant working at a temperature of 300 °C, where the drill bit would no longer work. But the temperatures got too high much earlier than expected and the researchers had to stop in 1992, when they were over 12 km into the Earth’s crust (and when funding dropped due to the fall of the Soviet Union.) At this depth and location, it was 180 °C.

The Kola Superdeep is drilled at a spot called Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi, or ‘Wolf Lake on the Mountains’, near the town of Zapolyarny, Russia.
The borehole itself is all rusty and strangely unspectacular:


The borehole (shut.) Photo by Rosa Menkman


Photo from the official website documenting the KSB

The Kola Superdeep Borehole is still is the deepest artificial point on Earth. The site has been abandoned since 2008. Only Viktor lives there now….


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Michael Miller

Justin Bennet spoke to Viktor, the last geologist living there. Viktor worked on the Kola Superdeep project until it closed and has stayed on-site long after the drilling tower fell apart. He lives there alone and unofficially. Bennet recorded their discussions. They are wonderful. Viktor is a charming narrator and his lively stories give a nuanced and intelligent perspective on the motivations and dreams behind the whole project. He recounts the history of the Kola Superdeep, talks about the equipment used to create this ‘acupuncture point in the body of the earth’, his everyday life with only radio and wildlife as company, Sami shamanism, Syrians on bikes and Dante’s circles of hell.
At some point, he also explained how while listening to vibrations deep within the Earth, he sensed that some terrible catastrophe was going to happen around the Coast of Japan back in 2011 (that was the T?hoku earthquake and tsunami.)

Bennett’s Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains is an extraordinary work. It’s a documentary piece, a sound art work and probably the most interesting and easily accessible source of information about the Kola Superdeep project.

All the recordings are worth listening to but if you are in a hurry, do at least make some time for the last one which allows you to listen inside the borehole:

For more background and info, check out this Dark Ecology article as well as some of the photos i stole from Sonic Acts flickr album of the project:


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by BJ Nilsen for Sonic Acts


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Rosa Menkman for Sonic Acts


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Rosa Menkman for Sonic Acts


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Rosa Menkman for Sonic Acts


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Michael Miller


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Michael Miller


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Michael Miller


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Michael Miller


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Michael Miller


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Lucas van der Velden


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by BJ Nilsen for Sonic Acts


Justin Bennett, Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains, 2016. Photo by Rosa Menkman for Sonic Acts

Vilgiskoddeoayvinyarvi: Wolf Lake on the Mountains is part of the exhibition The Noise of Being by Sonic Acts. It will be on view as a three-part audiovisual installation in which the sound piece is combined with footage taken at the abandoned Kola Superdeep Borehole.
The Noise of Being exhibition speculates on the strange and anxious state of being human. With works by Justin Bennett, Zach Blas, Kate Cooper, Joey Holder and Pinar Yoldas. The piece is on view until the 26th of February at Arti et Amicitiae, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Source

Bud Light: Heart

Video of Bud Light – Heart (:15)

Bud Light: Best friends

Video of Bud Light- Best Friends (:15)

Bud Light: Really rare

Video of Bud Light – Really Rare (:15)

Bud Light: My back

Video of Bud Light – My Back (:15)