#YouTubeIsOverParty trends when content creators discover Youtube policies are enforced – is seen as censorship

Youtube have rolled out a new email alert system intended to make it easier for content creators to know which videos are blocked from monetization, thus giving creators the chance to appeal the decisions via manual review, but the community has reacted calling it a form of censorship. Most notably, Philip DeFranco (@phillyd), head of DeFranco Creative who has 4.5 million subscribers and sold his portfolio of YouTube video channels to Revision3, the online-video unit of Discovery Communication. He started the hashtag #YouTubeisoverparty which quickly trended. The Youtube policy regarding de- monetizing videos due to advertiser-friendly concerns has been in place since Youtube began serving ads on creators’ content. But the ability to see which ad was monetized or not was only previously available by checking the video’s analytics dashboard. Since Youtube is a Google property, this is simply an extension of the Adsense rules – you know the network that banned Adland not once, not twice, but three times due to the many bare bottoms in advertising. The problem with Adsense, who bought doubleclick and has its finger in pretty much every ad-network jar out there, is that it is essentially an advertising media monopoly online. If you are banned from Adsense, you are banned from everywhere. If you have a single video de-monetized from Youtube, well…good luck with that. Still sucks though, especially when it’s your business plan to make money using a platform where someone else dictates the rules and can change them at any time according to the TOS that you agreed to when you began uploading your content to the platform.

Youtube: This isn’t a policy change, its just a notification/appeal change.Me: So before you were just turning off ads and not emailing us?— Philip DeFranco (@PhillyD) September 1, 2016

In short: yes. Here’s another thing you may not have known: If a channel has the Content Verification Tool enabled, it can’t monetize any uploaded content at all. A common misconception is that anyone who files a DMCA complaint against a video on Youtube gets the earnings from that video, since the monetization ends until the complaint is settled. In other words, one could in theory “make a career” out of making false DMCA complaints on Youtube. In reality however, disputed videos don’t earn revenue for anyone*, while creators of art, content and music fight it out like gladiators in the ring. To make matters worse, automated bots are filing complaints, battling the equally automated bots that scrape sites like his for videos to upload to Youtube. The bot creators may make a buck or two, while Youtube and Google toast in champagne in their yacht in Cannes every year. Lovely, isn’t it?

Despite millions of content creators waking up to Youtube’s reality, this new “advertiser friendly” alert isn’t as drastic as the change in 2015 when Youtube tightened the rules of sponsored content, nudging creators back into the reservation prohibiting branded overlays from sponsors, unless they buy their ads through Google. That essentially forced creators who hosted their channels on Youtube into using only Youtube to create sponsorship deals. From Youtube’s standpoint, it makes a lot of sense. It’s their media platform after all, and ensuring that overlays don’t clash with pre-rolls makes the advertising media worth more since no brand wants to show up at your Youtube party wearing the same dress as the competing brand.

What is interesting is seeing which channels are deemed “not advertiser friendly,” as so many creators are sharing in the hashtag the content that has de-monetized in their channel. Makeup queen Melanie Murphy who shares how to cover up acne discovered that her tutorials are deemed “not advertising friendly.” Meanwhile, back in 2013 National Geographic and Geico had ads pre-rolling on beheading videos on Youtube. And while makeup tutorials and jihadi beheadings aren’t created equal, it’s the latter situation that Youtube is attempting to end in order to still be attractive to advertisers. But bot-created piracy and random ISIS beheading channels can operate long enough without interference, because they aren’t as lucrative, while hugely popular human Youtubers are far more likely to get caught in the arbitrary net due to their popularity, and other users reporting their content. It doesn’t help the censorship claims at all when Youtubers who share opinions on controversial subjects – or political leanings – find they have been de-monetized.

YouTube’s new update means ads are disabled on my acne videos because advertisers don’t like it. Seriously @YouTube? pic.twitter.com/DoMokuvJvn— Melanie Murphy (@melaniietweets) August 31, 2016

DeFranco is clear on what he thinks about this move. “…Taking away monetization, it’s a form of censorship,” he said in a video posted Thursday. It is in the sense that Youtube are now in control of what content can be monetized online – because Youtube is more or less the video monopoly online. Everyone who watches Youtube, and hosts on Youtube has put their eggs in that one digital basket, like willing prey to the succubus. Pre 2010, I attended many workshops where “gurus” taught newspapers, magazines and even TV channels the ways of social and online media, charging an arm and a leg just to tell them to upload everything to Youtube, and Flickr, and slap a CC license on everything. Now the chickens are coming home to roost as former media empires have discovered that handing over your content to someone else’s platform means you lock your income into that platform as well. Only now, a million other users keep creating work for Youtube like digital serfs, while they hope to be the next internet famous person. Though let’s be honest: It won’t pay for the majority of you.

Because popular Youtubers are great at joining in on trending topics with their finger always on the pulse and share buttons, much mirth was had in the #YoutubeisOverParty hashtag. Censorship was the overall sense people have about the new notification system, and jokes were made about using the word “moist,” or changing the channel to only fluffy fun colourful peeps to be safe. Funny stuff that I am sure will attract even more viewers to each creators, as well as Youtube. Everyone wins, including the people complaining the loudest. But as we’ve proven time and time again, Google always wins the most.

But if you’re really honest, you have nothing to complain about. After all, you were the ones who gave your content up for their platform. You’re the ones who made them the bank. Youtube is now our content Ceasar, thumbing up or down as the crowds cheer.

Changing up my content a little bit to fit the new YouTube rules.#YouTubeIsOverParty pic.twitter.com/P7OgJTaJRu— Luna (@Lunaa) September 1, 2016

Sorry guys theres no new video tomorrow, I accidentally said the word ‘moist’ and I’m scared YouTube police will kill me #YouTubeIsOverParty— Sam King (@Samkingftw) September 1, 2016

Naturally there’s concern that people will “tame” their content to ensure that they can keep monetizing their content, making a tamer, lamer, Youtube for us all. In fact the entire internet will be tamed when Google is essentially the advertising monopoly on it. How tame? Put it this way, one popular Youtuber discovered that his suicide prevention videos have lost their monetisation status.

#YoutubePartyIsOver Don’t try to save lives on youtube if you plan for it to be part of your business model, kids. pic.twitter.com/Nf2NRWDdcn— boogie2988 (@Boogie2988) September 1, 2016

* the “anyone” statement was only made in April 2016, if a video is still viewable and Google ads are still running on it, I don’t see how Google or Youtube aren’t making money off that as advertisers still pay per view or click.

Adland: 

Vid.me positions itself as bastion of Video Liberty after #YouTubeIsOverParty trends – is same shit, different name

Vid.me has responded to the current Youtube controversy with a timely video of their own “from the humans at Vid.me” after the YoutubeIsOverParty trended on Twitter. They’re smart to do so, after all it was the content creators of Youtube that gave them a 50% year over year increase in viewership for the last three years, and if these creators are now unhappy with Youtube, Vid.me would love to get that content creating community on their side.

Vidme combined a nice helicopter shot of the statue of liberty with an electric guitar version of the star spangled banner, and ended with an overlay of the American flag. Playing up on the freedom of speech angle, the freedom to cuss and have opinions, in a humorous way.

However, the sudden arbitrary de-monetisation of youtube videos that aren’t “advertiser friendly” isn’t about cursing, as Melanie Murphy was demonetized for having hide acne makeup tutorials. Demonetisation is much like the sudden flagging of Adsense pages, completely arbitrary.
Like when Paypal banned us for this image, which you could buy as a poster on Ebay stores and pay for with Paypal. Do not ask for logic.

It’s little wonder with rules seemingly enforced by half-blind puppies that people take de-monetisation personally, especially when some of the most frequently demonetized content is political opinion pieces. Youtube are not forthcoming with what exactly triggers a demonetisation, but have a flagging system for content which could play a role in drawing attention to certain videos. Meaning that anyone who does or says something that offends anyone else may get flagged “as offensive” which then attracts the Youtube bot that de-monetises the video. It’s never a good combination to have human viewers flag and bots act on it, but this is how most of our current crop of popular social websites work these days.

YouTube’s new update means ads are disabled on my acne videos because advertisers don’t like it. Seriously @YouTube? pic.twitter.com/DoMokuvJvn— Melanie Murphy (@melaniietweets) August 31, 2016

Much like Youtube, Vidme offers creators the ability to earn money off their content via their “Creator Program” or “Publisher Program”. On their Vidme Terms page they state quite clearly that: “you agree that Company shall determine, in its sole and absolute discretion, the number of Views for which you shall be compensated.” You see a million views and you get compensated for five thousand. Tough luck kid.
There is also the, by now standard, rights grabs further down:

However, by submitting User Content to the Services, you hereby grant Vidme a worldwide, non-exclusive, paid up and royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the User Content in connection with the Services and Vidme’s (and its successors’ and affiliates’) business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Services (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels.

Making sure that the creators have gone through the right channels and ensured they have the rights to each piece of uploaded content is sorted a paragraph further down. They ask that your videos “will not contain third party copyrighted material.” People will likely ignore this as “fair use” is still hugely misunderstood, but if your channel then gets disabled, you can’t cry about it. I’ll presume that the helicopter shot of the statue of Liberty and the music in their own clip followed this legal requirement.

You affirm, represent, and warrant that you own or have the necessary rights, licenses, permissions, and consents necessary to publish any User Content you submit. You further agree that all User Content you submit to the Services will not contain third party copyrighted material, or material that is subject to other third party proprietary or other rights, unless you have permission from the rightful owner of the material, or you are otherwise legally entitled to post the material and to grant Vidme all of the rights granted herein.

In the Prohibited Content sections, porn and underage porn is naturally handled, but also content that is “patently offensive, or promotes or condones racism, bigotry, hatred, or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual;” which undermines the Vidme video above. There is still a large group of people in this world who agree that swearing is clearly offensive. “Patently offensive” is a subjective term, impossible to nail down which opens the door to having the same exact situation playing out at Vidme as we’ve seen on Youtube.

Washing their hands properly from any user generated content (that they will earn money from), Vidme states “have the right, but not the obligation to remove or modify User Content for any reason.” To really make you feel safe in your choice of new video platform they tie the whole thing up with: We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to change or modify portions of these Terms at any time. Standard stuff these days, which also means that when they do change – and they will when they get bigger with your help – you can’t whine about it. You agreed to those terms.

Adland: 

Mellow Mushroom – Cravings – (2016) :30 (USA)

Mellow Mushroom - Cravings - (2016) :30 (USA)
Mellow Mushroom, a hippie-born pizza place in Atlanta, will roll out their first national campaign created by ad agency BooneOakley, Charlotte. The campaign consists of two :30s and two different :15 second edits, all playing on the old parody of pharma ads. Since “Mellow Mushroom” conjures up thoughts of the free-wheeling and pot smoking seventies when the chain was born, this old trope fits this brand better than most. In this spot we see a man suffering from “cravings”, while the smooth VO asks “Do you suffer from irritability, boredom, and chronic cravings?” Meanwhile the ticker-disclaimer ensures you know that they didn’t conduct any studies to back up these claims. “Not even one.”

Our protagonist finds that he feels better when he’s on Magic Mushroom. The punch-line of the campaign is to “Ask your doctor about Mellow Mushroom,” in this scene a lab-coated blond joins him in his booth and the VO declares “She may want to come with you.”

The ads will run ACC, during every Saturday afternoon game of the 2016 season, Mellow Mushroom is the season’s exclusive Official Presenting Sponsor. A large group of college football fans love a good pizza place, and research showed that these viewers were unfamiliar with the brand.

Commercials: 

Country: 

Mellow Mushroom – ED – (2016) :30 (USA)

Mellow Mushroom - ED - (2016) :30 (USA)
Like the other ads in this first national Mellow Mushroom campaign, this parodies pharma ads. ED ones, specifically – so the husband and wife can get it on when the mood comes on. Get their pizza on. And just like in Cravings, the ad suggests you ask your doctor – he may want to come with you. Eh, guys, phrasing… Remember, kids, if you find yourself sitting in a Mellow Mushroom for more than four hours, you may want to go home and come back another day. And Mellow Mushroom is not responsible for fresh ingredients getting stuck in your teeth.

Commercials: 

Country: 

Bug-Shaped Electric Cars – This Three-Wheeled Electric Car is Powered By Lithium-Polymer Batteries (GALLERY)

(TrendHunter.com) If you happen to find yourself in the market for a three-wheeled electric car that offers more than satisfactory functioning and an extremely eye-catching exterior design aesthetic, you might want…

FDA Scrubs Shelves of Antibacterial Soaps Using Triclosan


The Food and Drug Administration today finalized a rule to ban key ingredients from antibacterial hand and body wash products including triclosan and trilocarban though marketers have a year to comply and there are a handful of remaining antibacterial ingredients they may be able to keep using later.

“Consumers may think antibacterial washes are more effective at preventing the spread of germs, but we have no scientific evidence that they are any better than plain soap and water,” said Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, in a statement. “In fact, some data suggests antibacterial ingredients may do more harm than good over the long term.”

This doesn’t mean “antibacterial” soaps will be going away anytime soon. For one thing, the FDA essentially said all soap is antibacterial, giving marketers seeming leeway to keep using the term regardless of removing the ingredients. And when Colgate reformulated Palmolive Ultra-Antibacterial dish soap in 2011, it said it was making the formula better, and it currently uses a range of ingredients, including alcohol and salt, that don’t appear on the FDA list of banned or potential banned ingredients.

Continue reading at AdAge.com

Friday Odds and Ends

Marc USA Chicago teamed up with Red Snake for this “KnowNo” PSA campaign that aims to educate viewers about consent and sexual assault (video above). 

-TMW Unlimited CEO Chris Pearce “laments the ongoing farce” at JWT

-Digiday takes a look “Inside AKQA Casa in São Paulo.”

-Dublin-based agency Boys and Girls promoted John Kilkenny and Laurence O’Byrne to creative director positions. 

-Campaign explores “How R/GA London is bringing media into the creative world.”

-The Drum asks if Snapchat’s honeymoon phase with advertisers can last.

-AdAge asks, “So You Sponsor Colin Kaepernick, Now What?

 

Fan Duel: Definition lift

FanDuel: Two man sled

DraftKings Secures $150 Million in Funding Round Amid Legal Battles


Fantasy-sports company DraftKings closed $150 million of new funding Thursday in an oversubscribed round that included Revolution Growth, the venture firm co-founded by sports magnate Ted Leonsis, according to Chief Executive Officer Jason Robins.

The fresh capital builds upon previous funding from investors including the Kraft Group, which owns the New England Patriots, Madison Square Garden and a venture arm of Major League Baseball. Washington-based Revolution joined in this round and added partner Steve Murray to DraftKings’ board. Mr. Leonsis is majority owner of the National Basketball Association’s Washington Wizards and the Washington Capitals of the National Hockey League. Revolution also is an investor in Sportradar, a Swiss sports data startup.

Fortune reported earlier citing people familiar with the funding for DraftKings that the $150 million was raised at a lower valuation than a prior $2 billion value for the closely held fantasy-sports site. DraftKings raised funds at a valuation of more than $1 billion in July 2015. Revolution declined to comment on valuation. DraftKings spokeswoman Sabrina Macias didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

Continue reading at AdAge.com

Video Ad Review: AT&T Anti-Texting Ad a Punch in the Gut


AT&T and BBDO are back with another anti-texting ad. Ad Age Editor Ken Wheaton says “The Unseen” is a punch in the gut, but is hard to watch more than once.

Video by David Hall

Continue reading at AdAge.com

Sponsors Land Cameos in ESPN's College Football Playoff Campaign


As a roadside convenience, the Pilot brand meshed nicely with the crossroads metaphor, said Sean Hanrahan senior VP-brand and marketing solutions, ESPN. “The convenience store lies at the intersection of all the different roads leading to the playoff,” Mr. Hanrahan said. “Naturally, that setting is a perfect place to showcase so many of the College Football Playoff sponsors in a seamless, organic integration.”

Unlike last season’s campaign, which focused on the college football world’s collective desire to knock off Ohio State — the Oregon Duck looked positively murderous — this year’s more inclusive effort at times elevates the ordinary fan at the expense of the mascots. For example, rather than shine a spotlight on Stanford’s goofy, justly-derided Tree, the “Crossroads” spot depicts a Cardinal supporter buying an entire display of redwood-shaped car air fresheners. And no, those Auburn students staggering under their payload of toilet paper aren’t suffering from IBS, they’re gearing up to revive the campus tradition of “rolling the oaks at Toomer’s Corner.” (Besides, with three other tiger mascots on hand, an appearance by Aubie would’ve felt like big-cat overkill.)

An extension of ESPN’s original “Who’s In?” campaign from 2014, the latest CFP initiative gathers representatives from the teams most likely to vie for a spot in the Jan. 9 National Championship Game in Tampa. Defending champs Alabama cast a long shadow — literally — from their perch inside a crimson monster truck, while preseason No. 2 Clemson roars into the frame in a tricked-out Ford Mustang. In fact, only a handful of teams in the preseason AP Top 25 poll aren’t featured in the “Crossroads” spot.

Continue reading at AdAge.com

Scotiabank: Hockey dreams

Panasonic: Now much drier

90s Techno-Inspired Apparel – JULIUS' Spring/Summer Series Draws on a Record Label's Projects (GALLERY)

(TrendHunter.com) Japanese fashion label JULIUS added to its collection of luxurious and experimental menswear with its Spring/Summer 2017 series—which takes ques from looks prominent in the 90s techno scene….

Map: See the Markets Where Clinton, Trump and Johnson Are Spending on TV, Radio Ads


The Ad Age Presidential Campaign Ad Scorecard is sponsored by The Trade Desk

Editor’s note: Here’s the 29th installment of the 2016 Presidential Campaign Ad Scorecard. The chart below represents a collaboration between the Ad Age Datacenter — specifically, Kevin Brown, Bradley Johnson and Catherine Wolf — and Kantar Media’s Campaign Media Analysis Group (CMAG), together with Ad Age Digital Content Producer Chen Wu. Some context from Simon Dumenco follows. –Ken Wheaton

Last Friday we offered you a big-picture look at how much the Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton campaigns, together with the PACs supporting them, are spending on broadcast, cable and satellite TV, plus radio through the fall. (Spoiler if you missed it and haven’t clicked on that link yet: Clinton and friends are way ahead of Trump and friends.)

Continue reading at AdAge.com

Nonfiction: Attica, Attica: The Story of the Legendary Prison Uprising

Heather Ann Thompson’s “Blood in the Water” is about the Attica prison uprising of 1971, its aftermath, and the continuing quest for justice.

Nonfiction: Rachel Cusk Reviews Two Books About Assisted Reproduction

Julia Leigh’s “Avalanche” and Belle Boggs’s “The Art of Waiting” are memoirs about the desire for children and the psychological cost of infertility.

The Media Chart for September 2: 'The Boss' (Not That One) Is the Boss


Continue reading at AdAge.com

Map: See the Markets Where Clinton, Trump and Johnson Are Spending on TV, Radio Ads


The Ad Age Presidential Campaign Ad Scorecard is sponsored by The Trade Desk

Editor’s note: Here’s the 29th installment of the 2016 Presidential Campaign Ad Scorecard. The chart below represents a collaboration between the Ad Age Datacenter — specifically, Kevin Brown, Bradley Johnson and Catherine Wolf — and Kantar Media’s Campaign Media Analysis Group (CMAG), together with Ad Age Digital Content Producer Chen Wu. Some context from Simon Dumenco follows. –Ken Wheaton

Last Friday we offered you a big-picture look at how much the Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton campaigns, together with the PACs supporting them, are spending on broadcast, cable and satellite TV, plus radio through the fall. (Spoiler if you missed it and haven’t clicked on that link yet: Clinton and friends are way ahead of Trump and friends.)

Continue reading at AdAge.com