 |
 |
 |
| THE ORIGINAL? UNICEF – 2002 Source : Cannes Archive Agency : Springer & Jacoby (GER) |
LESS ORIGINAL Colgate Plax – 2009 Headline : “Bad breath?” Agency : Young & Rubicam (China) |
LESS ORIGINAL Subway / Obesity Awareness – 2012 Source : Adsoftheworld Agency : DDB (Puerto Rico) |
 |
 |
| THE ORIGINAL? Vicks Vaporub “Breathe deeply” – 2006 Source : Cannes Archive, Agency : TBWA Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) |
LESS ORIGINAL : Sudafed “Breathe clearly” – 2009 Source : Cannes 2009 outdoor longlist Agency : JWT London (United Kingdom) |
| Des affiches qui arrachent au moins un sourire, mais si les Anglais aspiraient à l’originalité c’est raté. Un exemple paru dans CB News Magazine N°1024 |
Sometimes, Google can be really difficult.
Is the recent ad by Welch’s for its grape juice the first one to incorporate the sense of taste? No:
Is it the first one to incorporate First Flavor’s peel-and-lick technology? No. Last September, there were alcohol flavored ads in Rolling Stone for a TV show; here’s First Flavor’s press release on the subject (and a brief mention on AdLab).
You could never tell, though, if you searched Google for “lickable ads” this week. Even First Flavor, the company that creates the strips, is not on the first three pages of search results. But all those blogs that regurgitate the same news piece are, in abundance:
Can the results that are obviously similar — and derivative — be grouped and collapsed, just like all related news are collapsed in Google News? Look at this mess:
This is site is run by Sascha Endlicher, M.A., during ungodly late night hours. Wanna know more about him? Connect via Social Media by jumping to about.me/sascha.endlicher.
