Meet the Hero Designer Who Publicly Shamed Showtime for Asking Him to Work for Free

When Showtime invited Dan Cassaro to join a design “contest” he felt amounted to milking professionals for free work, he let the network—and the world—know how he felt about it.

The offer, made to a number of designers, involved promoting the Floyd Mayweather-Marcos Maidana boxing match on Sept. 13. Those who submitted designs for Showtime’s use “could be eligible for a chance to win a trip to Las Vegas and have your artwork displayed in the MGM Grand during fight week!,” the network told Cassaro in an email.

After sending an email response slathered in sarcasm (“I know that boxing matches in Las Vegas are extremely low-budget affairs”), Cassaro then posted the exchange to Twitter.

Here’s the screenshot of the conversation (click to expand):

In the week since, Cassaro’s tweet has become a viral rallying cry for creatives who feel besieged by expectations of free work. It has more than 5,000 retweets and 5,600 favorites, and has become one of the topic’s most electrifying moments since Mike Monteiro’s “Fuck You Pay Me” speech in 2011. 

Showtime issued a response to BuzzFeed, saying the network is “a strong supporter of artists around the world. This contest, like many others, is entirely optional.”

We caught up with Cassaro to ask what it’s been like seeing his frustration go global.

AdFreak: Your tweet just keeps blowing up. A week later, it’s still being retweeted. What’s it been like watching it all unfold?
Dan Cassaro: It’s been pretty unreal. I would have double-checked my grammar if I knew this many people would see it.

Why did you go public with it? Clearly, you were frustrated. But after responding to Showtime, what made you say, “Screw it, I’m going to post this on Twitter”?
Partially I just wanted to do it as a joke. But I also wanted to let people know that while it’s good to say no to this kind of work, it’s even better to explain to everyone why this business model is unacceptable.

Why do you think it struck such a chord with designers and other creatives?
Because they all get these emails. And it’s not just designers. I received a ton of responses from writers, cartoonists, architects and people in other professions who get asked to work for free. I don’t know what it is. Maybe people think that if you went to art school you don’t understand money?

Were you concerned about calling out a brand like Showtime by posting the email? I’m guessing they won’t become a paying client anytime soon.
Who knows? Maybe they admire my pluck? Honestly, people valuing themselves and their work enough to say no to this kind of thing has more long-term value than any one job or one client.

Has Showtime responded directly to you?
They wrote me a short and very polite email. Honestly, it’s less about Showtime and more about these hack crowdsourcing campaigns that certain agencies are selling to them. There are lots of folks doing very cool things with user-generated content, but to ask professionals to compete against each other for potential “exposure” is completely different. It’s demeaning, and it lowers the value of everyone’s work.

Among your peers, clearly a vast majority of the response has been positive. Have any designers criticized you for how you handled it?
The response from designers has pretty much been all positive. Some guy on a boxing enthusiast forum called me a “slimy hipster,” though.

Do you think anything constructive will come out of this, for yourself or the industry?
I hope so. If nothing else, it’s good to get people talking about it.



Pinterest Clamps Down on Contests to Keep Them From Getting ‘Spammy’

Just a few months after Facebook finally eased off its restrictive contest guidelines, Pinterest seems to be taking the opposite approach. In a recent round of policy revisions and clarifications, the network has greatly limited the scope of promotions that can be hosted by brands and bloggers.

In a blog post published Thursday, Pinterest marketing rep Kevin Knight laid out the many types of promotions that Pinterest isn't cool with. Specifically prohibited are promotions that:

• Suggest that Pinterest sponsors or endorses them or the promotion
• Require people to Pin from a selection (like a website or list of Pins)
• Make people Pin the contest rules
• Run a sweepstakes where each Pin, board, like or follow represents an entry
• Encourage spammy behavior, such as asking participants to comment
• Ask to vote with Pins, boards or likes
• Require a minimum number of Pins

Worth noting: Per these rules, a Pinterest contest can never have more than one entry per person, even if someone pins 100 items or engages with the contest every day for two weeks. Also, brands can't require contest participants to pin from a specific site or set of boards—a frequent tactic for helping spread branded content.

These updates come (probably not coincidentally) as Pinterest staffers have been in a lengthy email exchange with influential mom blogger Amy Lupold Bair, who had registered the trademark for the term "pinning party." When she attempted to enforce the trademark on other virtual party hosts, Pinterest's legal team told her to stop—and that her pinning parties for brand clients were in violation of their promotion guidelines anyway.

But when Lupold Bair asked for specifics on how a Pinterest promotion could or should be run, it soon became clear that the guidelines are complicated, poorly communicated (by Pinterest's own admission) and currently being observed by almost no one. When asked by Lupold Bair for a specific promotion that actually had followed the rules correctly, Pinterest policy chief Jud Hoffman acknowledged, "It's true that there aren't many examples of contests that follow our rules and encourage people to pin things that represent their authentic interests."

One upside of this week's discussions is that Pinterest has finally provided some relatively detailed explanation of its rules and reasoning. Sifting through Pinterest's lengthy responses to both myself and Lupold Bair, here are the answers to a few frequently asked questions:

Why restrict brands from allowing multiple contest entries?

"The distinction we're trying to make is between a contest where someone who creates ten boards would be entered ten times and one where the person is entered only once regardless of the number of boards she creates. We don't allow the ten board/ten entry example because we've found that people tend to create boards and pins that feel 'spammy' to their followers." —Pinterest policy director Jud Hoffman, in an email to blogger Amy Lupold Bair

What's been wrong with the way most Pinterest contests are run?

"Done well, they can be a trigger to help people think about the cool things you're doing. But they can also motivate people to add Pins they aren’t truly interested in, which is why Pins from contests can often feel irrelevant and even spammy. We don't want people to feel like they have to Pin things they don't like because it will help them win something." —Annie Tan, Pinterest Corporate Communications, in an email to Adweek.

What would a legitimate Pinterest contest look like?

"You can imagine a contest sponsored by a canned food company that asks people to create a board representing their ideal Thanksgiving meal, with the winner getting all of the ingredients to prepare that meal. As long as they don't require pinning one of their products or from a selection of pins, that contest would be fine. People would be free to put together a board that really represents their tastes and the pinner would have a chance at a great prize sponsored by the food company." —Hoffman, in an email to Lupold Bair

Will Pinterest be enforcing these rules across the board?

Depends on who you ask:

"If we see contests like the ones you seem to be helping to organize, we will stop them and also let the contest sponsor know. Seems like a situation we all would want to avoid." —Anthony Falzone, deputy general counsel for Pinterest, in an email to Lupold Bair.

"We're a small team, so unfortunately we're not able to reach everyone running contests that break our rules. Please know that we're not asking that you alone follow them. We try hard to reach out to contest sponsors as soon as we discover they are violating our rules to ask that they correct them going forward." —Hoffman, in an email to Lupold Bair.


    

Make an Ad About Truth in Advertising, and You Could Win $5,000

Truth in advertising? Bwaa ha ha ha ha! Actually, that's the title of a new first novel by former Ogilvy & Mather creative exec John Kenney. The book is about a copywriter who faces a life crisis while trying to create a diaper commercial for the Super Bowl. (Hey, we've all been there.) Now, Kenney's publisher, Touchstone, is holding a contest asking people to design ads for the book. The deadline for submissions, which must feature the title and author's name, was just extended to April 30. The winner gets $5,000. The entries are so far a very mixed bag. Nicholas Howard produced the best video, in my estimation, with Brother Ali's primal and infectious "Truth is here, the truth is here!" playing over snippets of Truth in Advertising's media reviews. My favorites among the print include a giant circle (more like a black hole) with the tiny word "square" in parentheses beneath; a big yellow happy face with its mouth taped shut and the headline "Just sell smiles"; and a mammoth asterisk atop a huge block of unreadable fine print. Another intriguing, evocative image shows a strange billboard with a shiny, seemingly reflective surface in some lonely wasteland on the edge of town. Its creator, Ray Ludacer, tells AdFreak that it's a photograph of a blurry bar code, designed to symbolize that "the lines of what is true in advertising are often blurred. You can see it as a mirror too." Hmmm, might be a tad too cerebral for ad land, Ray. Next time, just make the logo bigger.

But what I really want to do is direct.

You know the old saying, the grass is always greener on the other other side of the fence?
Well, when you don’t work in advertising, the other side is an ad agency. And when you do work in advertising, the other side is Hollywood. Now all you frustrated copywriters can get a chance to create your own FOX sit-com!

The New York Television Festival (NYTVF) has partnered with FOX to create a Comedy Script Contest.

read more

Who won the Luke Sullivan book (and charmins?)

Well, we’ve gone through the often aggressive and sometimes kinda gross lines in the little game we played where you could win Luke Sullivan’s book, “Hey Whipple” third edition or a signed package of Charmins. Without further ado, here are the ones that stuck out as Luke, Caff, Robblink and myself went through over one hundred lines looking for a winner.

read more

WIN the new edition of Luke Sullivans Hey Whipple! OR a signed Charmins package.

Way back in the year 2000 you could win a signed copy of the Luke Sullivan book just by the effort of signing up. HaHaSoup won that book (and I bet he still has it, don’t you HahaSoup?).

Well, here’s your chance again – since Luke Sullivan has come out with another edition of his widely popular “Hey Whipple, Squeeze This” book which includes new chapters addressing the galloping development of the web and the myriad of new media areas, we thought we’d throw another competition. Rules inside.

read more

Morrison Bowmore Launches Prize Draw to Promote Black Bowmore

Digital marketing agency Chunk has launched a new campaign for Morrison Bowmore, targeting Whisky lovers and collectors Worldwide who have been waiting with anticipation for the release of Bowmore’s oldest ever expression the now legendary Black Bowmore. In conjunction with its release one lucky winner will be drawn at random to win one of these limited edition bottles worth £2000.

Each of the 827 bottles have come from a single cask filled on the 5th of November 1964 and are individually hand numbered and come with a wooden presentation case.

read more